Abstracts
Fipronil
CAS No. 120068-37-3
For more abstracts search PubMed or Toxnet
 
 

Return to
Index Page
Adverse Effects
NTIS Reports

ACTIVITY: Acaracide, Insecticide (pyrazole), Wood Preservative (to control termites)

CAS NAME: 5-amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-[(trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl]-1H-pyrazole-3-carbonitrile

Structure:

 

2004-2006 - US EPA CHEERS study in Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida.
This 2-year study of children's exposure to selected pesticides and chemicals has ignited enormous controversy. Fipronil was one of 16 pesticides selected to be monitored in children (ages 0-3 years). See FAN's updates on this study.


See reports available from The National Technical Information Service
(NTIS)


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9681970&dopt=Abstract

Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Aug;106(8):437-45.

Mode of carcinogenic action of pesticides inducing thyroid follicular cell tumors in rodents.

Hurley PM.

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460 USA.

Of 240 pesticides screened for carcinogenicity by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs, at least 24 (10%) produce thyroid follicular cell tumors in rodents. Thirteen of the thyroid carcinogens also induce liver tumors, mainly in mice, and 9 chemicals produce tumors at other sites. Some mutagenic data are available on all 24 pesticides producing thyroid tumors. Mutagenicity does not seem to be a major determinant in thyroid carcinogenicity, except for possibly acetochlor; evidence is less convincing for ethylene thiourea and etridiazole. Studies on thyroid-pituitary functioning, including indications of thyroid cell growth and/or changes in thyroxine, triiodothyronine, or thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, are available on 19 pesticides. No such antithyroid information is available for etridiazole, N-octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide, terbutryn, triadimefon, and trifluralin. Of the studied chemicals, only bromacil lacks antithyroid activity under study conditions. Intrathyroidal and extrathyroidal sites of action are found: amitrole, ethylene thiourea, and mancozeb are thyroid peroxidase inhibitors; and acetochlor, clofentezine, fenbuconazole, fipronil, pendimethalin, pentachloronitrobenzene, prodiamine, pyrimethanil, and thiazopyr seem to enhance the hepatic metabolism and excretion of thyroid hormone. Thus, with 12 pesticides that mode of action judgments can be made, 11 disrupt thyroid-pituitary homeostasis only; no chemical is mutagenic only; and acetochlor may have both antithyroid and some mutagenic activity. More information is needed to identify other potential antithyroid modes of thyroid carcinogenic action.

PMID: 9681970 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14643964

Toxicol Lett. 2004 Jan 15;146(2):121-7.
 
Reproductive adverse effects of fipronil in Wistar rats.

Ohi M, Dalsenter PR, Andrade AJ, Nascimento AJ.

Departamento de Farmacologia, Setor de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal do Parana, 81531-980 /PR Curitiba, Brazil. pdalsenter@ufpr.br

The purpose of the present study was to investigate possible reproductive adverse effects of fipronil (Frontline TopSpot) in female Wistar rats. The pesticide was topically applied to rats (single dose) at different concentrations (70, 140 and 280 mg/kg) and hormonal analysis, estrous cycle, and pregnancy and outcome data were determined. Treatment with fipronil altered cyclicity of female rats lengthening the estrous cycle (days) after a single topic administration of 70 mg/kg (9.7+/-1.18) or 280 mg/kg (14.5+/-1.45) when compared to control (4.8+/-0.17). In the mating study fipronil reduced the pregnancy index (67%) in the highest dose group (280 mg/kg). Plasma progesterone and estradiol levels, obtained in different periods after treatment with fipronil (70 mg/kg), were significantly different 96 h after treatment, when compared to controls. In summary, the results of the present study indicate that fipronil may alter the normal functioning of the endocrine system and cause adverse reproductive effects in female rats.

PMID: 14643964 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

See Also

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14567575

Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003 Sep;71(3):497-503.

Effects of fipronil and chlorpyrifos on endocrine-related endpoints in female grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio).

Volz DC, Wirth EF, Fulton MH, Scott GI, Strozier E, Block DS, Ferry JL, Walse SS, Chandler GT.

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

PMID: 14567575 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12442503&dopt=Abstract

Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003;176:1-66.

Fipronil: environmental fate, ecotoxicology, and human health concerns.

Tingle CC, Rother JA, Dewhurst CF, Lauer S, King WJ.

Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich at Medway, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK.

Fipronil is a highly effective, broad-spectrum insecticide with potential value for the control of a wide range of crop, public hygiene, amenity, and veterinary pests. It can generally be applied at low to very low dose rates to achieve effective pest control. Application rates vary between 0.6 and 200 g a.i./ha, depending on the target pest and formulation. It belongs to the phenyl pyrazole or fiprole group of chemicals and is a potent disrupter of the insect central nervous system via interference with the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA-) regulated chloride channel. Fipronil degrades slowly on vegetation and relatively slowly in soil and in water, with a half-life ranging between 36 hr and 7.3 mon depending on substrate and conditions. It is relatively immobile in soil and has low potential to leach into groundwater. One of its main degradation products, fipronil desulfinyl, is generally more toxic than the parent compound and is very persistent. There is evidence that fipronil and some of its degradates may bioaccumulate, particularly in fish. Further investigation on bioaccumulation is warranted, especially for the desulfinyl degradate. The suitability of fipronil for use in IPM must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. In certain situations, fipronil may disrupt natural enemy populations, depending on the groups and species involved and the timing of application. The indications are that fipronil may be incompatible with locust IPM; hence, this possibility requires further urgent investigation. It is very highly toxic to termites and has severe and long-lasting negative impacts on termite populations. It thus presents a long-term risk to nutrient cycling and soil fertility where termites are "beneficial" key species in these ecological processes. Its toxicity to termites also increases the risk to the ecology of habitats in which termites are a dominant group, due to their importance as a food source to many higher animals. This risk has been demonstrated in Madagascar, where two endemic species of lizard and an endemic mammal decline in abundance because of their food chain link to termites. Fipronil is highly toxic to bees (LD50 = 0.004 microgram/bee), lizards [LD50 for Acanthodactylus dumerili (Lacertidae) is 30 micrograms a.i./g bw], and gallinaceous birds (LD50 = 11.3 mg/kg for Northern bobwhite quail), but shows low toxicity to waterfowl (LD50 > 2150 mg/kg for mallard duck). It is moderately toxic to laboratory mammals by oral exposure (LD50 = 97 mg/kg for rats; LD50 = 91 mg/kg for mice). Technical fipronil is in toxicity categories II and III, depending on route of administration, and is classed as a nonsensitizer. There are indications of carcinogenic action in rats at 300 ppm, but it is not carcinogenic to female mice at doses of 30 ppm. The acute toxicity of fipronil varies widely even in animals within the same taxonomic groups. Thus, toxicological findings from results on standard test animals are not necessarily applicable to animals in the wild. Testing on local species seems particularly important in determining the suitability of fipronil-based products for registration in different countries or habitats and the potential associated risk to nontarget wildlife. Risk assessment predictions have shown that some fipronil formulations present a risk to endangered bird, fish, and aquatic and marine invertebrates. Great care should thus be taken in using these formulations where they may impact any of these endangered wildlife groups. Work in Madagascar has highlighted field evidence of this risk. The dose levels at which fipronil produces thyroid cancer in rats are very high and are unlikely to occur under normal conditions of use. There is also dispute as to whether this is relevant to human health risk. However, as fipronil is a relatively new insecticide that has not been in use for long enough to evaluate the risk it may pose to human health, from data on human exposure to the product, a precautionary approach may be warranted. The use of some fipronil-based products on domestic animals is not recommended where handlers spend significant amounts of time grooming or handling treated animals. In general, it would appear unwise to use fipronil-based insecticides without accompanying environmental and human health monitoring, in situations, regions, or countries where it has not been used before, and where its use may lead to its introduction into the wider environment or bring it into contact with people. Further work is needed on the impacts of fipronil on nontarget vertebrate fauna (amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals) in the field before the risk to wildlife from this insecticide can be adequately validated. Further field study of the effects of fipronil on the nutrient cycling and soil water-infiltration activities of beneficial termites is required to assess the ecological impacts of the known toxicity of fipronil to these insects.

Publication Types: Review; Review, Academic

PMID: 12442503 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


From Dart Special at Toxnet: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/

Neurotoxicology 2000 Feb-Apr;21(1-2):251

Retrospective analysis of EPA's developmental neurotoxicity testing battery.

Makris S

US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC.

On December 8, 1998, a study entitled "A Retrospective Analysis of Twelve Developmental Neurotoxicity Studies Submitted to the USEPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)", co-authored by Susan Makris, William Sette, Kathleen Raffaele, and Jennifer Seed, was presented to the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel. In this paper, the methods and results (maternal and offspring) of all developmental neurotoxicity studies received in OPPTS and reviewed by EPA scientists as of November, 1998 were summarized. This data set included studies on 9 pesticides (aldicarb, carbaryl, carbofuran, chlorpyrifos, DEET, emamectin, fipronil, molinate, and "chemical X" which was not identified by name since it had not yet been registered) and 3 solvents (1,1,1-trichloroethane, triethylene glycol monomethyl ether, and isopropanol). For each chemical, the data on prenatal developmental toxicity, reproductive toxicity, and acute and subchronic adult neurotoxicity were summarized for comparison to the developmental neurotoxicity study findings. Additionally, the studies, NOELs and endpoints selected for acute and chronic dietary risk assessment for these chemicals were presented. The offspring NOELs from the developmental neurotoxicity studies were compared with those of the other studies within each chemical database, as well as with those studies that were selected for risk assessment. The conclusions of this analysis are considered preliminary, given the limited number of studies available, the lack of breadth of chemical classes evaluated, and other confounding factors that may have influenced study design and interpretation of results. The analysis revealed that positive findings in the offspring were noted across studies for all types of observations recorded: developmental landmarks, behavioral/functional observations, sensory function, motor activity, learning and memory, brain weight, and/or neuropathology. In addition, there was a high degree of coincident findings in the functional and structural assessments; for five of the six pesticides for which morphometric analysis was conducted, alterations were identified in both behavior and brain morphology. The detection of coincident findings in the developmental neurotoxicity studies was considered to be likely due to a variety of biological and methodological factors, including the focus of these studies on developmental profiles derived from assessments at multiple time points. This supports the need to assess a variety of functional and developmental neurobehavioral and neuropathological endpoints to screen for effects on nervous system development. It was concluded that the evaluation of effects on neurological development, through conduct of the OPPTS developmental neurotoxicity study, can be a sensitive indicator of toxicity to offspring. This was, in part, demonstrated by the fact that for two of the nine pesticides evaluated, the NOEL for developmental neurotoxicity was lower than or equal to that for any adult or offspring endpoint from the prenatal developmental, reproduction, or neurotoxicity studies. Additionally, since this study examines endpoints which are not evaluated in any other guideline toxicology study, it is a valuable tool in the characterization of hazard to infants and children. The paper proposed ways in which developmental neurotoxicity data should be considered in the process of selecting endpoints for risk assessment of pesticides in EPA. In the course of this review, various general issues were raised pertaining to the developmental neurotoxicity study methodology and interpretation of results, and have provided a preliminary focus for discussions that are expected to culminate in future guideline revision. The topics include: the route of administration, the duration of treatment, the use of combined protocols, biochemical measures of exposure or effect (e.g., cholinesterase inhibition), pharmacokinetic data, and age-related susceptibility.


From Toxline at Toxnet: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/

Year of Publication: 2002

Supporting Agency: U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES

State: CALIFORNIA

Zip Code: 94720-3112

GABAERGIC INSECTICIDE TOXICOLOGY

CASIDA JE

ECTL@NATURE.BERKELEY.EDU, UNIV OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, 114 WELLMAN HALL, BERKELEY, CA 94720-3112

Source: Crisp Data Base National Institutes of Health

The long-term objective is to define the fundamental basis for the selective toxicity of insecticides acting at the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor of mammals and insects. This is the target of major neurotoxic insecticides acting as both blockers and activators of the GABA-gated chloride channel. More than 5,000,000,000 pounds of these channel blockers have been used for pest control in the past 50 years and they range in chlorine content from 52-73%. The major channel blockers used at present, representing 6% of the insecticide market, are endosulfan and lindane and this market share will increase with expanded use of the newly-commercialized polyhalogenated fipronil. The activators such as avermectin and moxidectin are also used in ever increasing quantities as insecticides and anthelmintics. More specifically, the goal is to provide toxicological profiles and maps for the insecticide blocker site and the insecticide activator site by designing and using high-affinity radioligands (the insecticide itself or a closely-related model compound) and photoaffinity probes to study binding site interactions and localization in the brain and chloride channel. Emphasis will be placed on the discovery of differences between the GABA receptors of mammals and insects that confer preferential sensitivity to insecticides and safety to mammals. The proposal is to prepare suitable radioligands and photoaffinity probes and use them to localize the binding sites as to brain region, receptor subunit and specific derivatized amino acid(s) in the chloride channel of mammals (bovine) and insects (Drosophila); the chemistry to achieve this end comes largely from discoveries in this laboratory. The research also involves rat cerebellar granule cells in primary culture to study radioligand binding and chloride flux in intact cells, localization of radioligand binding in mouse brain slices following in vitro and in vivo exposure to unlabeled toxicants, and receptors derived from Sf9 cells transfected with cDNs of human GABAa receptor subunits.


From Toxline at Toxnet: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/

Supporting Agency: U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE

State: ILLINOIS

Year of Publication: 2002

Zip Code: 60611-3008

Mode of Action of Insecticides: Electrophysiological

NARAHASHI T

TNA597@NWU.EDU, NORTHWESTERN UNIV MED SCH, 303 E CHICAGO AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL 60611-3008

Source: Crisp Data Base National Institutes of Health

The long-term goal of the proposed study is to elucidate the mechanism by which neuroactive insecticides exert their toxic actions. The specific aims of the proposed renewal application are to elucidate the physiological mechanisms that underlie the selective toxicity of several selected newer insecticides between mammals and insects. Most insecticides are much more toxic to insects than to mammals, and the mechanism of selective toxicity lies in many cases in differential actions on the target neuroreceptors/ion channels. Although recent developments and applications of molecular biology and genetics techniques have identified the molecular structures such as amino acid compositions of target receptors/channels that are deemed responsible for differential actions, almost nothing is known about how the differential actions are brought about as a result of the difference in molecular structures. Our working hypothesis is that the differential actions of insecticides on the target receptor/channels of mammals and insects could be caused by some difference in the kinetics of receptors/channels. For example, insecticide modification of the channel may be dependent upon the channel open or closed state, the kinetics of insecticide binding and unbinding, the temperature coefficient, etc. In order to elucidate the physiological mechanisms of selective toxicity, patch clamp data on the kinetics of receptors/channels and those of insecticide modification will be compared between rat and cockroach neurons for fipronil modulation of GABA receptors, imidacloprid modulation of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nnAChRs), spinosad modulation of nnAChRs and GABA receptors, and indoxacarb modulation of sodium channels, nnAChRs and GABA receptors. The results thus obtained are expected to answer the question of how selective toxicity between mammals and insects can be explained in terms of the differential actions on the target receptors/channels. This information will significantly contribute to the development of newer therapeutic means of insecticide intoxication of humans and of more effective and safer insecticides.


March 3, 2004. Federal Register. Docket No. ORD-2003-0011.

Longitudinal Study of Young Children's Exposures in their Homes to Selected Pesticides, Phthalates, Brominated Flame Retardants, and Perfluorinated Chemicals (A Children's Environmental Exposure Research Study--CHEERS).

Abstract: The U.S. EPA's Office of Research and Development's National Exposure Research Laboratory proposes to conduct a two-year longitudinal field measurement study of young children's (aged 0 to 3 years) potential exposures to current-use pesticides and selected phthalates, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and perfluorinated compounds that may be found in residential environments. The study will be conducted in Duval County, Jacksonville, Florida over a two-year period from 2004 to 2006. Sixty young children will be recruited into this study in two cohorts: (1) infants recruited into the study soon after birth, and, (2) children recruited into the study at approximately 12 months of age.

Part A: Supporting Statement - EPA ICR Number: 2126.01 - 61 pages
From Table 2:
• Of 16 pesticides included in this study, 4 are fluorinated:
Bifenthrin, Fipronil, lamda-Cyhalothrin, and Cyfluthrin I, II, III, IV, total
• Perfluorinated chemicals:
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
From Table 3: List of chemicals to be analyzed in biological media:
• one is fluorinated: 4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzoic acid
• Perfluorooctanoic acid/Perfluorooctane sulfonate


Full free report at http://www.fluoridealert.org/pesticides/fipronil.ca.epa.2001.pdf

December 2001

ENVIRONMENTAL FATE OF FIPRONIL

Pete Connelly

Environmental Monitoring Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency

This document reviews the environmental fate and environmental effects of fipronil (5-
amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluromethyl)phenyl]-4-[(trifluromethyl)sulfinyl]-1H-
pyrazole). Fipronil (C12H4Cl2F6N4OS), a phenylpyrazole insecticide, was discovered by Rhone-Poulenc Agro in 1987, introduced in 1993, and registered as a pesticide in the U.S in 1996 ...


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16172884&query_hl=1

Invert Neurosci. 2005 Sep 20;:1-15 [Epub ahead of print]
 
Ion channels: molecular targets of neuroactive insecticides.

Raymond-Delpech V, Matsuda K, Sattelle BM, Rauh JJ, Sattelle DB.

MRC Functional Genetics Unit, Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QX, UK, david.sattelle@anat.ox.ac.uk.

Many of the insecticides in current use act on molecular targets in the insect nervous system. Recently, our understanding of these targets has improved as a result of the complete sequencing of an insect genome, i.e., Drosophila melanogaster. Here we examine the recent work, drawing on genetics, genomics and physiology, which has provided evidence that specific receptors and ion channels are targeted by distinct chemical classes of insect control agents. The examples discussed include, sodium channels (pyrethroids, p,p'-dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT), dihydropyrazoles and oxadiazines); nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (cartap, spinosad, imidacloprid and related nitromethylenes/nitroguanidines); gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors (cyclodienes, gamma-BHC and fipronil) and L: -glutamate receptors (avermectins). Finally, we have examined the molecular basis of resistance to these molecules, which in some cases involves mutations in the molecular target, and we also consider the future impact of molecular genetic technologies in our understanding of the actions of neuroactive insecticides.

PMID: 16172884 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15701711&query_hl=1

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Jul;314(1):363-73. Epub 2005 Feb 8.
 
Sulfone metabolite of fipronil blocks gamma-aminobutyric acid- and glutamate-activated chloride channels in mammalian and insect neurons.

Zhao X, Yeh JZ, Salgado VL, Narahashi T.

Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, Northwestern University Medical School, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Fipronil sulfone, a major metabolite of fipronil in both insects and mammals, binds strongly to GABA receptors and is thought to play a significant role in poisoning by fipronil. To better understand the mechanism of selective insecticidal action of fipronil, we examined the effects of its sulfone metabolite on GABA- and glutamate-activated chloride channels (GluCls) in cockroach thoracic ganglion neurons and on GABA(A) receptors in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Fipronil sulfone blocked both desensitizing and nondesensitizing GluCls in the cockroach. Activation was required for block and unblock of desensitizing GluCls. In contrast, activation was not prerequisite for block and unblock of nondesensitizing channels. After repetitive activation of the receptors, the IC50 of fipronil sulfone to block the desensitizing GluCls was reduced from 350 to 25 nM and that for blocking nondesensitizing GluCls was reduced from 31.2 to 8.8 nM. This use-dependent block may be explained by its slow unbinding rate. In cockroach and rat neurons, fipronil sulfone blocked GABA receptors in both activated and resting states, with IC50 values ranging from 20 to 70 nM. In conclusion, although fipronil sulfone is a potent inhibitor of cockroach GABA receptors, desensitizing and nondesensitizing GluCls, and rat GABA(A) receptors, its selective toxicity in insects over mammals appears to be associated with its potent blocking action on both desensitizing and nondesensitizing GluCls, which are lacking in mammals.

PMID: 15701711 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16044331&query_hl=1

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Sep;191(9):823-36. Epub 2005 Sep 13.
 
Acetylcholine, GABA and glutamate induce ionic currents in cultured antennal lobe neurons of the honeybee, Apis mellifera.

Barbara GS, Zube C, Rybak J, Gauthier M, Grunewald B.

Institut fur Biologie, AG Neurobiologie, Freie Universitat Berlin, Konigin-Luise-Str. 28-30, 14195, Berlin, Germany, gruenewa@zedat.fu-berlin.de.

The honeybee, Apis mellifera, is a valuable model system for the study of olfactory coding and its learning and memory capabilities. In order to understand the synaptic organisation of olfactory information processing, the transmitter receptors of the antennal lobe need to be characterized. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, we analysed the ligand-gated ionic currents of antennal lobe neurons in primary cell culture. Pressure applications of acetylcholine (ACh), gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) or glutamate induced rapidly activating ionic currents. The ACh-induced current flows through a cation-selective ionotropic receptor with a nicotinic profile. The ACh-induced current is partially blocked by alpha-bungarotoxin. Epibatidine and imidacloprid are partial agonists. Our data indicate the existence of an ionotropic GABA receptor which is permeable to chloride ions and sensitive to picrotoxin (PTX) and the insecticide fipronil. We also identified the existence of a chloride current activated by pressure applications of glutamate. The glutamate-induced current is sensitive to PTX. Thus, within the honeybee antennal lobe, an excitatory cholinergic transmitter system and two inhibitory networks that use GABA or glutamate as their neurotransmitter were identified.

PMID: 16044331 [PubMed - in process]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16102801&query_hl=1

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005 Aug 12; [Epub ahead of print]
 
Effects of sublethal doses of fipronil on the behavior of the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

El Hassani AK, Dacher M, Gauthier M, Armengaud C.

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Universite Paul Sabatier Toulouse III-CNRS UMR 5169, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 04, France.

Fipronil is a phenylpyrazole insecticide introduced for pest control, but it can also affect non-target insects such as honeybees. In insects, fipronil is known to block GABA receptors and to inhibit ionotropic glutamate-gated chloride channels, but the behavioral effects of low doses are not yet fully understood. We have studied the effect of sublethal doses of fipronil on the behavior of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) under controlled laboratory conditions. The drug was either administered orally or applied topically on the thorax. A significant reduction of sucrose sensitivity was observed for the dose of 1 ng/bee 1 h after a thoracic application. No significant effect on sucrose sensitivity was obtained with acute oral treatment. A lower dose of fipronil (0.5 ng/bee applied topically) impaired the olfactory learning of the honeybees. By contrast, locomotor activity was not affected. Our results suggest a particular vulnerability of the olfactory memory processes and sucrose perception to sublethal doses of fipronil in the honeybee.

PMID: 16102801 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15750780&query_hl=1

Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005 Feb;48(2):242-50. Epub 2005 Feb 15.
 
Comparative sublethal toxicity of nine pesticides on olfactory learning performances of the honeybee Apis mellifera.

Decourtye A, Devillers J, Genecque E, Le Menach K, Budzinski H, Cluzeau S, Pham-Delegue MH.

Association de Coordination Technique Agricole, Maison des Agriculteurs, La Tour de Salvagny, France. axel.decourtye@acta.asso.fr

Using a conditioned proboscis extension response (PER) assay, honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) can be trained to associate an odor stimulus with a sucrose reward. Previous studies have shown that observations of conditioned PER were of interest for assessing the behavioral effects of pesticides on the honeybee. In the present study, the effects of sublethal concentrations of nine pesticides on learning performances of worker bees subjected to the PER assay were estimated and compared. Pesticides were tested at three concentrations. The highest concentration of each pesticide corresponded to the median lethal dose value (48-h oral LD50), received per bee and per day, divided by 20. Reduced learning performances were observed for bees surviving treatment with fipronil, deltamethrin, endosulfan, and prochloraz. A lack of behavioral effects after treatment with lambda-cyalothrin, cypermethrin, tau-fluvalinate, triazamate, and dimethoate was recorded. No-observed-effect concentrations (NOECs) for the conditioned PER were derived for the studied pesticides. Our study shows that the PER assay can be used for estimating sublethal effects of pesticides on bees. Furthermore, comparisons of sensitivity as well as the estimation of NOECs, useful for regulatory purposes, are possible.

PMID: 15750780 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16097320&query_hl=1

Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005 May;74(5):872-9.

Acute toxicity of imidacloprid and fipronil to a nontarget aquatic insect, Simulium vittatum Zetterstedt cytospecies IS-7.

Overmyer JP, Mason BN, Armbrust KL.

University of Georgia, Department of Entomology, 413 Biological Sciences Building, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

No abstract available

PMID: 16097320 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16193765&query_hl=1

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Sep;24(9):2350-5.

Acute enantioselective toxicity of fipronil and its desulfinyl photoproduct to Ceriodaphnia dubia.

Konwick BJ, Fisk AT, Garrison AW, Avants JK, Black MC.

Department of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.

Fipronil is a phenylpyrazole insecticide increasingly used in applications such as rice culture, turf grass management, and residential pest control, with a high probability to contaminate aquatic environments. As a chiral pesticide, fipronil is released to the environment as a racemic mixture (equal amounts of optical isomers called enantiomers). Enantiomers can have different toxicological and biological activity; however, information on these differences, which is necessary for accurate risk assessment of chiral pesticides, is limited. Here we examine the acute toxicity of fipronil enantiomers, the racemate, and its photoproduct (desulfinyl fipronil) to Ceriodaphnia dubia. The 48-h median lethal concentration (LC50) values based on measured concentrations of each compound indicate the (+) enantiomer (LC50 = 10.3 +/- 1.1 microg/L, mean +/- standard error [SE]) was significantly more toxic to C. dubia than either the (-) enantiomer (LC50 = 31.9 +/- 2.2 microg/L) or racemate (LC50 = 17.7 +/- 1.3 microg/L). To account for any potential loss of fipronil through photolysis, tests were performed under light (fluorescent) and dark exposure conditions, and no significant differences in toxicity were observed. Desulfinyl fipronil, the major photodegradation product, which is not chiral, was detected at < 1% of each parent compound in test solutions after 48 h. Separate toxicity tests with desulfinyl fipronil found a > 20-fold higher LC50 (355 +/- 9.3 microg/L) compared to the fipronil racemate, suggesting lower adverse effects to C. dubia as a result of fipronil photolysis. The present results suggest selection of the (-) enantiomer in fipronil production for lower impacts to C. dubia; however, the consistency and relevancy of fipronil's enantiomer-specific activity at both acute and chronic levels of concern to additional target and nontarget species needs further consideration.

PMID: 16193765 [PubMed - in process]


Toxicology - Article in Press, Corrected Proof
Received 7 April 2005;  revised 27 May 2005;  accepted 31 May 2005.  Available online 11 July 2005.

Transient alterations in neuronal and behavioral activity following bensultap and fipronil treatment in rats

Viktor Szegedi, György Bárdos, László Détári, Attila Tóth, Ilona Banczerowski-Pelyhe and Ildikó Világi,

Eötvös Loránd University, Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, 1117 Budapest, Hungary

In the present multilevel study, neuromodulatory effect of two insecticides, bensultap and fipronil were investigated in rats. Although the new generation of insecticides shows greater affinity to invertebrate as compared to mammalian receptors, toxic effect of these compounds in vertebrates cannot be excluded. The aim of the study was to follow the course of neuronal changes in rats for 1 week after a high-dose insecticide exposure. Alterations in synaptic excitability, in sleep–wake pattern and in behavior were analyzed using conventional in vitro brain slice method, long-lasting EEG recordings, and open-field tests. The two chemicals examined in this study induced only weak and transient effects. Bensultap, acting on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, caused a transient decrease in neuronal excitability. Sleep and behavioral changes demonstrated a similar time course. Fipronil, on the other hand, increased excitability and its effect lasted slightly longer. All effects were greatest on the first day following ‘poisoning’, and measured variables usually returned to normal within a week. These results suggest that the studied compounds do have some effects on the mammalian nervous system, but this effect is usually mild and temporary.


Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety ; Volume 62, Issue 1 , September 2005, Pages 11-16

Toxicity and hazard assessment of fipronil to Daphnia pulex

John D. Stark (a) , and Roger I. Vargas (b)

(a) Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Puyallup Research and Extension Center, Pioneer Way East 7612, Puyallup, WA 98371, USA
(b) USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 4459, Hilo, HI 96720, USA

Received 20 September 2004;  revised 24 February 2005;  accepted 25 February 2005.  Available online 11 April 2005.

Hazard assessments based on two measures of toxicity were conducted for the water flea, Daphnia pulex (Leydig) exposed to the insecticide, fipronil. The measures of toxicity obtained were 48 h acute lethal concentration estimates, and a direct measure of population growth rate, the 10-day instantaneous rate of increase (ri). Additionally, life tables were developed after exposure to several concentrations to tease out the apparent sublethal effects of this insecticide to D. pulex. The acute LC50 was estimated to be 0.0156 (0.0088–0.083) mg/L. In the 10-day population growth rate study, extinction of D. pulex populations occurred after exposure to 0.08 mg/L of fipronil, which was equivalent to the 48 h acute LC75. The NOEC and LOEC for population size after a 10-day exposure to fipronil were 0.03 and 0.05 mg/L, respectively. An expected environmental concentration (EEC) in freshwater lakes/ponds based on an application rate of 250 mg ai/ha (recommended rate for use in Tephritid fruit fly control programs) was estimated to be 0.00017 mg/L. Hazard assessments were developed by dividing the EEC by the LC50 and NOEC for population size. The assessments based on the LC50 and NOEC for population size were 0.011 and 0.0057, respectively, indicating that fipronil does not pose a hazard to D. pulex when applied at the rates recommended for control of Tephritid fruit flies. Life tables were developed after exposure to two insecticide concentrations and a control. Exposure to 0.015 mg/L, the approximate 48 h acute LC50, resulted in only a slight decrease in the net reproductive rate (Ro), birth rate (b), and intrinsic rate of increase (rm) and an increase in generation time (T), death rate (d), and doubling time (DT) compared to the control. Exposure to 0.03 mg/L, the approximate 48 h acute LC60, and NOEC in the 10-day study, resulted in a 57% decline in the net reproductive rate, a 1.45-fold decrease in birth rate, a 1.5-fold decrease in the intrinsic rate of increase, a 6-day increase in generation time, a 4-fold increase in death rate, and a 1.5-fold increase in doubling time. The stable age distribution (after 60 days) of D. pulex changed after exposure to fipronil. Increasing concentrations of fipronil resulted in a decrease in the percentage of individuals in the first, second, third, and fourth juvenile stages, an increase in the adult stage, and no change in the adolescent stage. These results indicate that certain concentrations of fipronil approaching the LC50 can negatively affect population parameters of D. pulex, but that EECs, at least for fruit fly control, should be lower than the concentration necessary to cause damage.

4. Discussion
Results of our study indicate that formulated fipronil is toxic to D. pulex causing both lethal and sublethal effects. Chaton et al. (2002) found that D. pulex was insensitive to fipronil and was not affected even at concentrations close to the water solubility of fipronil. However, Chaton et al. (2002) evaluated unformulated technical grade fipronil, while in our study, we evaluated formulated fipronil (Regent 4SC). The water solubility of fipronil is approximately 2.4 mg/L and according to Aventis, the formulation will not increase the solubility of the active ingredient. The 4SC formulation is a suspension concentrate; particles of fipronil are finely ground and suspended in water using a proprietary system of suspension agents. The formulation, therefore, has no effect on the water solubility of the active ingredient. However, smaller particle sizes in the formulated product may result in more active ingredients being ingested by Daphnia compared to the unformulated product. Furthermore, the formulation itself might be toxic. Because the formulated product is used for pest control, it has the potential to enter aquatic ecosystems and as such should be evaluated for toxicity to aquatic organisms.

Fipronil (Icon 6.2 FSTM) is also used as a seed treatment for rice to control rice water weevil. Schlenk et al. (2001) found that fipronil was very toxic to two crayfish species (Procambarus clarkii and P. zonangulus) with LC50 estimates of 14 and 19 µg/L, respectively. Their LC50 estimates are similar to the estimate developed for D. pulex (16 µg/L) in our study. Furthermore, Schlenk et al. (2001) conducted an in situ study in culturing ponds and found high levels of mortality in crayfish. A hazard quotient revealed that fipronil in water from Icon-treated rice seed plantings poses a significant risk to crayfish survival.

In contrast to the study by Schlenk et al. (2001), the study by Lahr (1998) indicated that fipronil was one of the least ecologically damaging insecticides to aquatic ecosystems in the Sahel.

Chandler et al. (2004) studied the effects of fipronil on the estuarine copepod, Amphiascus tenuiremis. Fipronil was highly toxic to A. tenuiremis with a 96-h acute LC50 of 6.8 µg/L. Additionally, exposure to fipronil delayed female and male development and nearly eliminated reproduction after exposure to 0.42µg/L.

Furthermore, our comparison of the EEC for rates of fipronil labeled for fruit fly control to toxicity endpoints indicated that fipronil should not pose a hazard to wild D. pulex populations. An interesting result in our study is that the NOEC in the 10-day population growth study was estimated to be 0.03 mg/L. However, exposure to this same concentration in the life table study resulted in a 1.5 decline in the intrinsic rate of increase. This can be explained by the fact that in the 10-day population study, D. pulex was only exposed for 10 days while in the life table study D. pulex was exposed over a lifetime. Walthall and Stark (1997) indicated that 10-day studies for aphids yielded population growth rates that were similar to those produced by life tables. However, in their study, exposures in both the 10-day and the life table experiments were similar in that aphids were exposed to plants that were sprayed once at the onset of the study. Demography and other population growth rate measures of toxicity are being used more frequently to evaluate toxicity (Stark and Wennergren, 1995; van Straalen and Kammenga, 1998; Forbes and Calow, 1999; Kammenga and Laskowski, 2000; Stark and Vargas, 2003; Herbert et al., 2004). Because demography takes into account all effects (lethal and sublethal) that a toxicant might have on a population and these studies are usually conducted throughout the life span of an organism, a complete measure of effect can be obtained (Stark and Banks, 2000 and Stark and Banks, 2003). A comparison of demographic and other endpoints of toxic effect has indicated that demographic toxicological endpoints and other measures of population effect such as the instantaneous rate of increase are superior to other endpoints of effect (Forbes and Calow, 1999; Herbert et al., 2004). Therefore, demographic and other population approaches for the evaluation of toxic effects should be more widely adopted.


Chandler, 2004 G.T. Chandler, T.L. Cary, D.C. Volz, S.S. Walse, J.L. Ferry and S.L. Klosterhaus, Fipronil effects on estuarine copepod (Amphiascus tenuiremis) development, fertility, and reproduction: a rapid life-cycle assay in 96-well microplate format, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23 (2004), pp. 117–124.

Chaton et al., 2002 P.F. Chaton, P. Ravanel, M. Tissut and J.C. Meyran, Toxicity and bioaccumulation of fipronil in the nontarget arthropodan fauna associated with subalpine mosquito breeding sites, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 52 (2002), pp. 8–12.

Forbes and Calow, 1999 V.E. Forbes and P. Calow, Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology?, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18 (1999), pp. 1544–1556.

Herbert et al., 2004 I.N. Herbert, C. Svendsen, P.K. Hankard and D.J. Spurgeon, Comparison of instantaneous rate of population increase and critical-effect estimates in Folsomia candida exposed to four toxicants, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 57 (2004), pp. 175–183.

Kammenga and Laskowski, 2000 J. Kammenga and R. Laskowski, Demography in Ecotoxicology, Wiley, West Sussex, England (2000).

Lahr, 1998 J. Lahr, An ecological assessment of the hazard of eight insecticides used in desert locust control, to invertebrates in temporary ponds in the Sahel, Aquat. Ecol. 32 (1998), pp. 153–162.

Schlenk et al., 2001 D. Schlenk, D.B. Huggett, J. Allgood, E. Bennett, J. Rimoldi, A.B. Beeler, D. Block, A.W. Holder, R. Hovinga and P. Bedient, Toxicity of fipronil and its degradation products to Procambarus sp.: field and laboratory studies., Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 41 (2001), pp. 325–332.

Stark and Banks, 2000 J.D. Stark and J.E. Banks, The toxicologists and ecologists point of view—unification through a demographic approach. In: J. Kammenga and R. Laskowski, Editors, Demography in Ecotoxicology, Wiley, West Sussex, England (2000), pp. 9–20.

Stark and Banks, 2001 J.D. Stark and J.E. Banks, Selective pesticides: are they less hazardous to the environment?, BioScience 51 (2001), pp. 980–982.

Stark and Vargas, 2003 J.D. Stark and R.I. Vargas, Demographic changes in Daphnia pulex (Leydig) after exposure to the insecticides, spinosad and diazinon, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 56 (2003), pp. 334–338.

Stark and Wennergren, 1995 J.D. Stark and U. Wennergren, Can population effects of pesticides be predicted from demographic toxicological studies?, J. Econ. Entomol. 88 (1995), pp. 1089–1096.

Van Straalen and Kammenga, 1998 N.M. Van Straalen and J.E. Kammenga, Assessment of ecotoxicity at the population level using demographic parameters. In: G. Shüürmann and B. Markert, Editors, Ecotoxicology, Ecological Fundamentals, Chemical Exposure, and Biological Effects, Wiley, New York (1998), pp. 622–644.

Walthall and Stark, 1997 W.K. Walthall and J.D. Stark, Comparison of two population-level ecotoxicological endpoints: the intrinsic (rm) and instantaneous (ri) rates of increase, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 (1997), pp. 1068–1073.


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15750780&query_hl=1

Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005 Feb;48(2):242-50. Epub 2005 Feb 15.
 
Comparative sublethal toxicity of nine pesticides on olfactory learning performances of the honeybee Apis mellifera.

Decourtye A, Devillers J, Genecque E, Le Menach K, Budzinski H, Cluzeau S, Pham-Delegue MH.

Association de Coordination Technique Agricole, Maison des Agriculteurs, La Tour de Salvagny, France. axel.decourtye@acta.asso.fr

Using a conditioned proboscis extension response (PER) assay, honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) can be trained to associate an odor stimulus with a sucrose reward. Previous studies have shown that observations of conditioned PER were of interest for assessing the behavioral effects of pesticides on the honeybee. In the present study, the effects of sublethal concentrations of nine pesticides on learning performances of worker bees subjected to the PER assay were estimated and compared. Pesticides were tested at three concentrations. The highest concentration of each pesticide corresponded to the median lethal dose value (48-h oral LD50), received per bee and per day, divided by 20. Reduced learning performances were observed for bees surviving treatment with fipronil, deltamethrin, endosulfan, and prochloraz. A lack of behavioral effects after treatment with lambda-cyalothrin, cypermethrin, tau-fluvalinate, triazamate, and dimethoate was recorded. No-observed-effect concentrations (NOECs) for the conditioned PER were derived for the studied pesticides. Our study shows that the PER assay can be used for estimating sublethal effects of pesticides on bees. Furthermore, comparisons of sensitivity as well as the estimation of NOECs, useful for regulatory purposes, are possible.

PMID: 15750780 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15859435&query_hl=1

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2005 Jan;26(1):185-9.

[Joint acute toxicity of fipronil and bata-cypermethrin to protozoa community]

[Article in Chinese]

Liu GG, Xu HJ, Wang LX, Zheng LQ.

Henan Key Laboratory for Environmental Pollution control, College of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453002, China. guoguangliu@263.net

Compared with the toxicity test on single organism, the effects of toxic pollutants on organisms at community level are more reliable. The acute single and joint toxic effects of Fipronil and Bata-cypermethrin on freshwater protozoa community are studied in this paper. The results show that the 48h-LC50 of Fipronil and Bata-cypermethrin to the microbial community was 35.83mg x L(- 1), 1.92mg x L(-1), the joint toxicity of Bata-cypermethrin and Fipronil was antagonism in 48h with toxicity 1: 1 to freshwater protozoa community, and Additive Index was -0.08. The structure of protozoa community would change in a low concentration of Bata-cypermethrin and Fipronil mixture; the species and population of Algivores(A) and Predators Raptors (P) would reduce but Bactivoresdetrivores(B) would become predominant relatively.

PMID: 15859435 [PubMed - in process]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15641641&query_hl=1

J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(7):955-63.

Acute human self-poisoning with the N-phenylpyrazole insecticide fipronil--a GABAA-gated chloride channel blocker.

Mohamed F, Senarathna L, Percy A, Abeyewardene M, Eaglesham G, Cheng R, Azher S, Hittarage A, Dissanayake W, Sheriff MH, Davies W, Buckley NA, Eddleston M.

South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

OBJECTIVE: Fipronil, a broad spectrum N-phenylpyrazole insecticide that inhibits GABAA-gated chloride channels, has been in use since the mid-1990s. A high affinity for insect compared to mammalian GABA receptors results in lower animal toxicity than other insecticides blocking this channel. To date, only two accidental cases of fipronil poisoning in humans have been published.
CASE SERIES: We report seven patients with fipronil self-poisoning seen prospectively in Sri Lanka together with pharmacokinetics for four patients. Non-sustained generalized tonic-clonic seizures were seen in two patients (peak measured plasma fipronil concentrations 1600 and 3744 microg/L); both were managed with diazepam without complications. A patient with a peak measured plasma concentration of 1040 microg/L was asymptomatic throughout his stay. Plasma concentration was still high at discharge 3-4 days post-ingestion when the patients were well. Retrospective review of >1000 pesticide poisoning deaths since 1995 found only one death from fipronil-based products. In contrast to the good outcome of the above cases, this patient required intubation and ventilation and had continuous fits despite therapy with barbiturates and benzodiazepines.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with prospectively observed patients suggests that fipronil poisoning is characterized by vomiting, agitation, and seizures, and normally has a favorable outcome. Management should concentrate on supportive care and early treatment of seizures. However, further experience is needed to determine whether increased susceptibility to fipronil or larger doses can produce status epilepticus.

Publication Types:
• Case Reports

PMID: 15641641 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15474615

Neurotoxicology. 2004 Dec;25(6):967-80.
 
Kinetic and pharmacological characterization of desensitizing and non-desensitizing glutamate-gated chloride channels in cockroach neurons.

Zhao X, Salgado VL, Yeh JZ, Narahashi T.

Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, Northwestern University Medical School, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Glutamate-gated chloride channels (GluCls) are found only in invertebrate nerve and muscle, where they mediate inhibitory synaptic transmission, and are important target sites of insecticides. Two GluCl subtypes have previously been distinguished in isolated cockroach CNS neurons based on differential pharmacology. The present study characterizes the kinetics and pharmacological properties of desensitizing and non-desensitizing GluCls. Both types of GluCls were sensitive to glutamate and ibotenic acid. The non-desensitizing GluCl subtype was elicited by glutamate with an EC(50) of 115.8 microM and a Hill coefficient of 2.6 and was also sensitive to the agonist ibotenic acid with an EC(50) of 42 microM and a Hill coefficient of 1.7. The desensitizing and non-desensitizing currents were carried by chloride ions, and occurred either separately or in combination in individual neurons. The GluCls were also found to coexist with and function independently of the GABA-activated chloride channels. The desensitizing and non-desensitizing GluCls exhibited different sensitivities to the ligand-gated channel blocker picrotoxinin. The desensitizing GluCls were blocked only 8% by 30 microM picrotoxinin, whereas the non-desensitizing GluCls were potently blocked by picrotoxinin with an IC(50) of 4.1 microM. The insecticides fipronil and dieldrin at 1 microM inhibited the desensitizing currents by 56 and 13%, respectively, and the non-desensitizing currents by 98 and 43%, respectively. It is concluded that the two types of GluCls found in cockroach neurons exhibit significantly different electrophysiological and pharmacological characteristics.

PMID: 15474615 [PubMed - in process]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15386133

Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2004 Oct;47(3):387-95.
 
A method to quantify and analyze the foraging activity of honey bees: relevance to the sublethal effects induced by systemic insecticides.

Colin ME, Bonmatin JM, Moineau I, Gaimon C, Brun S, Vermandere JP.

Universite de Montpellier II, Laboratoire de Pathologie Comparee des Invertebres, CC 101, Batiment 24, Place Eugene Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. colinme@ensam.inra.fr

The assessment of agropharmaceuticals' side effects requires more realistic simulations of field conditions than those deduced from the dose-lethality relation obtained under laboratory conditions. Because the presence of sublethal doses or concentrations may also alter the behavior of foraging insects, we attempted to devise a quantifiable and accurate protocol for evidencing various alterations in free-flying bees. Such a protocol was illustrated by testing new classes of systemic insecticides. The protocol focused on video recording to quantify the foraging activity of small colonies of honey bees confined in insect-proof tunnels. The basis of the protocol was not the colony itself but the change in each colony on a specific day and between days. First, the paradigms of attendance at a safe feeding source were established by observing 8 control colonies at different times of the season during 5 days after the necessary forager training was accomplished. Second, on three different colonies we considered the paradigms on the control day before contamination and during 4 days after the feeding source was contaminated. During the same period, one more colony was exclusively fed with safe food to serve as control. Two plant-systemic insecticides were tested at contamination levels 70 times lower than the 50% of the lethal concentration. Imidacloprid, at 6 microg/kg, clearly induced a decrease in the proportion of active bees. Fipronil, at 2 microg/kg, induced an additional decrease in attendance at the feeder. Such levels are still higher than the corresponding lowest observable effect concentration (LOEC). Our protocol, which provided intermediate conditions between field and laboratory conditions, allowed the quantification, with an enhanced level of sensitivity, of sublethal effects on foraging bees. Copyright 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

PMID: 15386133 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Environmental Pollution Volume 131, Issue 3 , October 2004, Pages 365-371

The effects of the contemporary-use insecticide (fipronil) in an estuarine mesocosm

E. F. Wirth (a), P. L. Pennington (b), J. C. Lawton (c), M. E. DeLorenzo (b), D. Bearden (a), B. Shaddrix (a), S. Sivertsen (a) and M. H. Fulton (a)

(a) Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research, NOAA, 219 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC 29412, USA
(b) Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
(c) Office of Response and Restoration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 77 West Jackson SR_6J, Chicago, IL 60604, USA

"Capsule": Fipronil exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations had a significant toxic effect on grass shrimp in mesocosms.  Available online 4 June 2004.

Abstract: To examine the effects of environmentally realistic fipronil concentrations on estuarine ecosystems, replicated mesocosms containing intact marsh plots and seawater were exposed to three treatments of fipronil (150, 355, and 5000 ng/L) and a Control. Juvenile fish (Cyprinidon variegatus), juvenile clams (Mercenaria mercenaria), oysters (Crassostrea virginica), and grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) were added prior to fipronil in an effort to quantify survival, growth, and the persistence of toxicity during the planned 28-day exposure. Results indicated that there were no fipronil-associated effects on the clams, oysters, or fish. Shrimp were sensitive to the highest two concentrations (40% survival at 355 ng/L and 0% survival at 5000 ng/L). Additionally, the highest fipronil treatment (5000 ng/L) was toxic to shrimp for 6 weeks post dose. These results suggest that fipronil may impact shrimp populations at low concentrations and further use in coastal areas should be carefully assessed.


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15214624

J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(2):189-90.

Accidental dermal and inhalation exposure with fipronil--a case report.

Chodorowski Z, Anand JS.

Department of Internal Medicine and Toxicology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk ul., Lanowa, Poland.

BACKGROUND: Fipronil which has initiated the new generation of insecticides and possesses greater affinity at GABA receptors in insects than humans is supposed to be safer than the old generation of insecticides. Dermal and inhalation exposure to fipronil has not been reported in the literature.
CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old male was admitted to the Clinic after 5h of spraying his field with the solution of fipronil. The patient was fully conscious with the BP and HR within normal range. There were no seizures, other neurological deficits, signs of conjunctivitis or skin irritation. Physical examinations and biochemical results were normal. The patient complained of a headache, nausea, vertigo and weakness. All symptoms resolved spontaneously after about 5h. During hospitalization and the follow up after three weeks he was asymptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations should be carried on to evaluate the risk of fipronil in humans. The benzodiazepines are drugs of choice during seizures, B1 agonists and steroids may be useful during severe inhalation exposure.

Publication Types:
* Case Reports

PMID: 15214624 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15261399

Environ Pollut. 2004 Oct;131(3):365-71.
 
The effects of the contemporary-use insecticide (fipronil) in an estuarine mesocosm.

Wirth EF, Pennington PL, Lawton JC, DeLorenzo ME, Bearden D, Shaddrix B, Sivertsen S, Fulton MH.

Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research, NOAA, 219 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.

To examine the effects of environmentally realistic fipronil concentrations on estuarine ecosystems, replicated mesocosms containing intact marsh plots and seawater were exposed to three treatments of fipronil (150, 355, and 5000ng/L) and a Control. Juvenile fish (Cyprinidon variegatus), juvenile clams (Mercenaria mercenaria), oysters (Crassostrea virginica), and grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) were added prior to fipronil in an effort to quantify survival, growth, and the persistence of toxicity during the planned 28-day exposure. Results indicated that there were no fipronil-associated effects on the clams, oysters, or fish. Shrimp were sensitive to the highest two concentrations (40% survival at 355ng/L and 0% survival at 5000ng/L). Additionally, the highest fipronil treatment (5000ng/L) was toxic to shrimp for 6 weeks post dose. These results suggest that fipronil may impact shrimp populations at low concentrations and further use in coastal areas should be carefully assessed.

PMID: 15261399 [PubMed - in process]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15298200

Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Jul 15;38(14):3908-15.

Role of dissolved organic matter, nitrate, and bicarbonate in the photolysis of aqueous fipronil.

Walse SS, Morgan SL, Kong L, Ferry JL.

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.

A multivariate kinetic model of aqueous fipronil photodegradation was developed as a function of dissolved organic matter (DOM), bicarbonate, and nitrate at concentrations that bracketthose commonly observed in natural waters (ca. 0-10 mg/L). Several pathways were available for fipronil photodegradation in this system, including direct photolysis and indirect photooxidation by species produced during the illumination of natural waters (e.g., 3NOM*, 1O2*, *OH, *CO3(1-), *OOR, *OOH, e(aq)-, O2(*-)). Product studies indicated that fipronil was quantitatively converted to fipronil desulfinyl, a product that is associated with direct photolysis alone. DOM was the only variable that affected fipronil degradation; it decreased the rate of fipronil photodegradation primarily through competitive light absorption (i.e., attenuation) and the quenching of fipronil*. The addition of sodium chloride (30 percent per thousand) resulted in a more rapid rate (approximately 20%) of fipronil loss in comparison to equivalent experiments performed without sodium chloride, implying that fipronil may be more photolabile in marine environments.

PMID: 15298200 [PubMed - in process]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15154517

Pest Manag Sci. 2004 May;60(5):487-92.

Fipronil modulation of GABAA receptor single-channel currents.

Ikeda T, Nagata K, Kono Y, Yeh JZ, Narahashi T.

Institute of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan.

Fipronil is the first phenylpyrazole insecticide introduced for pest control. Although fipronil is known to inhibit GABA receptors, the detailed mechanism of action remains to be seen. In order to elucidate the mechanism of fipronil interaction with the mammalian GABAA system, single-channel patch clamp experiments were performed using rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. The amplitude of main conductance state (27pS) current was not significantly altered by co-application of 10 microM fipronil and 10 microM GABA. The histograms of open time distribution were fitted to a sum of three exponential functions. After application of 10 microM fipronil, the proportion of the fastest component increased slightly and that of the slowest component decreased slightly. Thus, the mean open time was decreased from 11.4 ms to 7.8 ms by fipronil. The histograms of closed time distribution were fitted to a sum of four exponential functions. Fipronil 10 microM prolonged the slowest time constant resulting in a prolongation of the mean closed time from 29.7 ms to 52.8 ms. Thus, the frequency of channel openings was reduced. Thus, the fipronil suppression of GABA-induced whole-cell currents is caused in part by decreases in the channel open time and the frequency of channel openings.

PMID: 15154517 [PubMed - in process]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15135087

Chem Biol Interact. 2004 Apr 15;147(3):319-29.
 
In vitro metabolism of fipronil by human and rat cytochrome P450 and its interactions with testosterone and diazepam.

Tang J, Amin Usmani K, Hodgson E, Rose RL.

Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

Fipronil (5-amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-[(trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl]-1H-pyrazole-3-carbonitrile) is a highly active, broad spectrum insecticide from the phenyl pyrazole family, which targets the gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) receptor. Although fipronil is presently widely used as an insecticide and acaricide, little information is available with respect to its metabolic fate and disposition in mammals. This study was designed to investigate the in vitro human metabolism of fipronil and to examine possible metabolic interactions that fipronil may have with other substrates. Fipronil was incubated with human liver microsomes (HLM) and several recombinant cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms obtained from BD Biosciences. HPLC was used for metabolite identification and quantification. Fipronil sulfone was the predominant metabolite via CYP oxidation. The K(m) and V(max) values for human liver microsomes are 27.2 microM and 0.11 nmol/mg proteinmin, respectively; for rat liver microsomes (RLM) the K(m) and V(max) are 19.9 microM and 0.39 nmol/mg proteinmin, respectively. CYP3A4 is the major isoform responsible for fipronil oxidation in humans while CYP2C19 is considerably less active. Other human CYP isoforms have minimal or no activity toward fipronil. Co-expression of cytochrome b(5) (b(5)) is essential for CYP3A4 to manifest high activity toward fipronil. Ketoconazole, a specific inhibitor of CYP3A4, inhibits 78% of the HLM activity toward fipronil at a concentration of 2 microM. Oxidative activity toward fipronil in 19 single-donor HLMs correlated well with their ability to oxidize testosterone. The interactions of fipronil and other CYP3A4 substrates, such as testosterone and diazepam, were also investigated. Fipronil metabolism was activated by testosterone in HLM but not in CYP3A4 Supersomes. Testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation in HLM was inhibited by fipronil. Fipronil inhibited diazepam demethylation but had little effect on diazepam hydroxylation. The results suggest that fipronil has the potential to interact with a wide range of xenobiotics or endogenous chemicals that are CYP3A4 substrates and that fipronil may be a useful substrate for the characterization of CYP3A4 in HLM.

PMID: 15135087 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14982375

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004 Feb;23(2):298-305.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for lipovitellin quantification in copepods: a screening tool for endocrine toxicity.

Volz DC, Chandler GT.

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.

Vitellogenin (VTG) has been widely used as a biomarker of estrogenic exposure in fish, leading to the development of standardized assays for VTG quantification. However, standardized quantitative assays for invertebrate, particularly crustacean, lipovitellin (also known as vitellin [VTN]) are lacking. In this study, a fluorescence-based VTN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to quantify microquantities of VTN in the estuarine, sediment-dwelling copepod Amphiascus tenuiremis. This ELISA utilizes a VTN-specific polyclonal antibody developed against amphipod (Leptocheirus plumulosus) embryo VTN and exhibits specificity toward female copepod proteins. In routine assays, the working range of the ELISA was 31.25 to 1,000 ng/ml (75-25% specific binding/maximum antibody binding [B/B0]) with a 50% B/B0 intra- and interassay variation of 3.9% (n = 9) and 12.5% (n = 26), respectively. This ELISA is capable of detecting VTN as low as 2 ng/ml, and can accurately detect VTN in as few as four copepods. The ELISA significantly discriminated positive (gravid female) and negative (male) samples, and was suitable for screening endocrine toxicity in copepods. Stage-I juvenile copepods were individually reared to adults in aqueous microvolumes of the phenylpyrazole insecticide, fipronil, and whole-body homogenate extracts were assayed for VTN levels. Fipronil-exposed virgin adult females, but not males, exhibited significantly higher levels of VTN relative to control males and females. This crustacean VTN ELISA is likely useful for evaluating endocrine activity of environmental toxicants in copepods and other crustacean species.

PMID: 14982375 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14750729

Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Jan 15;38(2):522-8.

Phenylpyrazole insecticide fipronil induces male infertility in the estuarine meiobenthic crustacean Amphiascus tenuiremis.


Cary TL, Chandler GT, Volz DC, Walse SS, Ferry JL.

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Norman J. Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.