FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK
PESTICIDE PROJECT

Return to FAN's Pesticide Homepage

Return to PFOA Class Action Suit

Return to Newspaper articles and Documents related to this Class Action

C8 or C-8: PFOA is perfluorooctanoic acid and is sometimes called C8. It is a man-made chemical and does not occur naturally in the environment. The "PFOA" acronym is used to indicate not only perfluorooctanoic acid itself, but also its principal salts.
The PFOA derivative of greatest concern and most wide spread use is the ammonium salt (
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate) commonly known as C8, C-8, or APFO and the chemical of concern in the Class Action suit in Ohio.

Ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO or C8)
CAS No. 3825-26-1. Molecular formula:

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA or C8)
CAS No: 335-67-1
. Molecular formula:

The DuPont site where APFO is used as a reaction aid is the Washington Works (Route 892, Washington, West Virginia 26181) located along the Ohio River approximately seven miles southwest of Parkersburg, West Virginia.

The Little Hocking Water Association well field is located in Ohio on the north side of the Ohio River immediately across from the Washington Works facility. Consumers of this drinking water have brought a Class Action suit against the Association and DuPont for the contamination of their drinking water with DuPont's APFO, which residents and media refer to as C8.

PFOA is used as a processing aid in the manufacture of fluoropolymers to produce hundreds of items such as non-stick surfaces on cookware (TEFLON), protective finishes on carpets (SCOTCHGUARD, STAINMASTER), clothing (GORE-TEX), and the weather-resistant barrier sheeting used on homes under the exterior siding (TYVEK).

 

http://www.athensnews.com/issue/article.php3?story_id=18052

September 13, 2004

The Athens News (Ohio)

DuPont settlement would pay east-county water customers

By Jonathan Hunt
Athens NEWS Contributor

A tentative settlement announced Thursday could offer several thousand residents of eastern Athens County about $1,000 each in direct payments for drinking water tainted by a chemical DuPont uses to make Teflon.

The agreement in principle awaits approval by Wood County, W.Va. Circuit Judge George W. Hill, and affected water customers would have a chance to give feedback on the plan.

If the settlement goes forward, litigation that began when Mid-Ohio Valley residents sued DuPont in August 2001 could end with the Delaware-based chemical company's total expense for those claims being capped at $107.6 million -- but only if a $5 million health study included in that figure finds no causal relationship between the chemical and human diseases including birth defects.

A positive link between diseases and the chemical -- known as C-8, perfluorooctanoic acid or PFOA -- would trigger another payout of up to $235 million by DuPont to fund medical monitoring of exposed persons. That scenario would mean a potential cost to DuPont of $342 million plus any liability arising from new or reopened claims.

A joint press release by both sides in the lawsuit stipulated the company will "not contest general causation between PFOA and any such disease in any personal injury claims that plaintiffs may pursue" if a three-person team of doctors chosen by the parties discovers a link.

"What's really important is that every person who is found to have a related disease preserves their claim," plaintiffs' attorney Harry Deitzler said Friday. "The statute of limitations for the claims against DuPont is put on hold."

Jury selection for a civil trial in the class action case had been scheduled for Oct. 12 in Parkersburg.

Court approval of the new agreement will prevent the current plaintiffs from acquiring medical monitoring, property damages or any punitive damages via a jury award, the press release said.

If approved, the $107.6 million will include $10 million to provide new DuPont-developed filtering systems to remove most PFOA from impacted water systems. Another $20 million will fund PFOA-related public education projects in the region, and $22.6 million will go toward residents' legal fees.

DuPont Director of Media Relations Clif Webb said Friday that the filtration technology is already available.

"We gained a great deal of experience as far as filtration mediums," Webb said about the company cutting PFOA emissions at its Washington Works plant near Parkersburg. The facility, sited on land George Washington once owned, is the largest DuPont factory in the world and employs about 2,200 people.

Though both sides hailed the settlement as a fair and scientific way to proceed, residents' health concerns will likely remain in limbo while the study takes place over a period of years. A separate health study commissioned by the National Institutes for Health is under way in Washington County.

DuPont fought Judge Hill's April 2003 order to provide PFOA blood monitoring before the trial and won a reversal at the West Virginia Supreme Court last December. It now might avoid this expensive process entirely if the new health study absolves the chemical from health effects.
Webb reiterated DuPont's faith that this is a benign substance.

"We certainly are confident about the safety of PFOA," he said. "The science says there's no human health effect. We also believe if they make a determination there is no (disease) association, then this matter would be put to rest."

Webb cited DuPont's temporary removal of female workers from the Teflon production unit in 1981 as evidence of its emphasis on safety. Two of the workers bore children with facial birth defects, and PFOA turned up in a healthy baby's umbilical cord, an internal company document released in the discovery phase of the lawsuit showed.

There is no proof the defects were caused by PFOA exposure, however.

The federal EPA levied fines that could reach hundreds of millions of dollars against DuPont in July for not alerting the agency to the birth defects or to the company's knowledge PFOA had seeped into local groundwater by the 1980s.

DuPont is appealing the fines.

Deitzler and Webb agreed the selection of the health-study panel will go smoothly.

"We have the right to veto, and they have the right to veto," said Deitzler. "If we consider them industry-friendly we're not going to agree to them. If they consider them lawyers' experts, they're not going to agree to them."

"I think the process is exactly the right process," Webb said.

Deitzler said Athens County residents who drank Little Hocking or Tuppers Plains-Chester water for a year or more probably will be eligible to benefit from the settlement, and the $50 million in cash payments will be distributed fairly among about 50,000 people in six water districts.

"Everybody will receive equal treatment at this level, but the prime concern is the interest of the group as a whole," said Deitzler. "It's absolutely critical that we have full participation."

Residents seeking more information on the agreement may contact Wood County Circuit Court at (304) 424-1700.