FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK
PESTICIDE PROJECT

Return to FAN's Pesticide Homepage

Return to PFOA Class Action Suit

Return to Newspaper articles and Documents related to this Class Action

C8 or C-8: PFOA is perfluorooctanoic acid and is sometimes called C8. It is a man-made chemical and does not occur naturally in the environment. The "PFOA" acronym is used to indicate not only perfluorooctanoic acid itself, but also its principal salts.
The PFOA derivative of greatest concern and most wide spread use is the ammonium salt (
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate) commonly known as C8, C-8, or APFO and the chemical of concern in the Class Action suit in Ohio.

Ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO or C8)
CAS No. 3825-26-1. Molecular formula:

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA or C8)
CAS No: 335-67-1
. Molecular formula:

The DuPont site where APFO is used as a reaction aid is the Washington Works (Route 892, Washington, West Virginia 26181) located along the Ohio River approximately seven miles southwest of Parkersburg, West Virginia.

The Little Hocking Water Association well field is located in Ohio on the north side of the Ohio River immediately across from the Washington Works facility. Consumers of this drinking water have brought a Class Action suit against the Association and DuPont for the contamination of their drinking water with DuPont's APFO, which residents and media refer to as C8.

PFOA is used as a processing aid in the manufacture of fluoropolymers to produce hundreds of items such as non-stick surfaces on cookware (TEFLON), protective finishes on carpets (SCOTCHGUARD, STAINMASTER), clothing (GORE-TEX), and the weather-resistant barrier sheeting used on homes under the exterior siding (TYVEK).



http://www.ewg.org/issues/PFCs/20040812/index.php

August 12, 2004

Press Release from the Environmental Working Group (Washington DC)
Contact: Lauren Sucher, 202-667-6982

DuPont Sticks To Denials In Teflon Pollution Probe

EWG Calls for Swift Imposition of Maximum Fine

WASHINGTON — Repeating arguments it advanced last year and which have since been rejected by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), DuPont today denied that it had illegally suppressed birth defect and water pollution studies for 17 years as its Teflon-related chemical contaminated the bloodstream of virtually every American.

DuPont was responding to an EPA petition charging the company with violating the Toxic Substances Control Act and another federal law by suppressing the studies. The Agency can now fine DuPont up to $313 million, request a hearing before a judge, or wait for an undetermined period of time — even past this November's presidential election.

"If it truly is DuPont's corporate philosophy not to disclose information they collect about chemical contamination of their worker's fetuses or the tap water of the communities they operate in, it makes you wonder what else the company knows but isn't telling the public about their products and facilities," said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group (EWG). "That is the reputation DuPont is building for itself in this Teflon scandal. And the corollary is, the public will never really know what DuPont knows about contamination or pollution, or when they knew it, until someone sues them," Cook added.

"DuPont's response today shows that it is an unrepentant global polluter which needs to face the maximum fine EPA can levy; the company must learn that it cannot suppress studies of Teflon's toxicity that carry global public health implications," said EWG Senior Scientist Dr. Timothy Kropp.

The fine for three of the violations runs $25,000 or $27,500 daily for periods spanning 10 and 20 years. EWG has calculated the maximum fine could be $313 million. DuPont's annual profits from the sale of Teflon are $200 million.

The EPA's complaint against DuPont resulted from an April 2003 EWG petition to the Agency that brought the undisclosed studies to light after they were discovered in ongoing litigation in West Virginia.

The Teflon chemical, known as PFOA, and its variants belong to a family of fluorine-containing substances that are unusually persistent—they have yet to be shown to break down in the environment—and have been found to cause cancer, birth defects and other health problems in laboratory animals. A recent study found PFOA and related chemicals in human blood around the world. The combination of toxicity, persistence and pervasiveness in humans and wildlife has triggered growing concern from regulatory scientists in the U.S., Canada, and Europe reminiscent of the scrutiny that led to bans on DDT, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and other notorious pollutants which were banned in the 1970s.

Teflon chemicals are used to make dozens of widely used products, such as Teflon and other coated cookware, fast food containers such as French fry and pizza boxes, clothing, outdoor gear, furniture, carpet treatments such as Stainmaster, cleaning products and even cosmetics. DuPont's own website brags that "it's everywhere," with a graphic animation showing products that contain Teflon in every room of the house.

The EPA placed PFOA, also known as C8, on its priority investigation list in September 2002 after Agency officials negotiated the phaseout in 2000 of a related chemical known as PFOS that was used in Scotchgard. The EPA's concerns about the Scotchgard chemical — health effects and worldwide pollution -- were nearly the same as those that have emerged about the Teflon substance.

# # #

The Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit research organization based in Washington, DC that uses the power of information to protect human health and the environment. Four years' worth of EWG research on Teflon chemicals and related substances is available at http://www.ewg.org/issues/PFCs/index.php.