FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK
PESTICIDE PROJECT

Return to FAN's Pesticide Homepage

Return to PFOA Class Action Suit

Return to Newspaper articles and Documents related to PFOA Class Action

C8 or C-8: PFOA is perfluorooctanoic acid and is sometimes called C8. It is a man-made chemical and does not occur naturally in the environment. The "PFOA" acronym is used to indicate not only perfluorooctanoic acid itself, but also its principal salts.
The PFOA derivative of greatest concern and most wide spread use is the ammonium salt (
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate) commonly known as C8, C-8, or APFO and the chemical of concern in the Class Action suit in Ohio.

Ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO or C8)
CAS No. 3825-26-1. Molecular formula:

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA or C8)
CAS No: 335-67-1
. Molecular formula:

The DuPont site where APFO is used as a reaction aid is the Washington Works (Route 892, Washington, West Virginia 26181) located along the Ohio River approximately seven miles southwest of Parkersburg, West Virginia.

The Little Hocking Water Association well field is located in Ohio on the north side of the Ohio River immediately across from the Washington Works facility. Consumers of this drinking water have brought a Class Action suit against the Association and DuPont for the contamination of their drinking water with DuPont's APFO, which residents and media refer to as C8.

PFOA is used as a processing aid in the manufacture of fluoropolymers to produce hundreds of items such as non-stick surfaces on cookware (TEFLON), protective finishes on carpets (SCOTCHGUARD, STAINMASTER), clothing (GORE-TEX), and the weather-resistant barrier sheeting used on homes under the exterior siding (TYVEK).

 


http://www.wvgazettemail.com/section/APNews/News/ap0072r

The Charleston Gazette (West Virginia)

November 23, 2004

Judge OKs terms of C8 settlement

By ERIK SCHELZIG

Associated Press Writer

PARKERSBURG, W.Va. (AP) -- A judge on Tuesday approved the terms of an almost $70 million medical study of up to 80,000 people who drank water contaminated with C8, a chemical used to make Teflon at DuPont Co.'s Washington Works plant.

Blood tests will be conducted on current customers of area water districts, former customers of those suppliers, and residents with private wells. Lawyers for the residents hope to test anyone who drank contaminated water for at least a year.

Wood County Circuit Court Judge George W. Hill congratulated the two sides for agreeing on the settlement.

"I commend the parties on a job well done, as far as I can tell,'' Hill said. "We'll see if it works out as well.''

General terms of the settlement were released in September, but a formal settlement agreement was not filed until last week. The settlement will not be final until after a public hearing on Feb. 28.

Legal notices will be published notifying the customers of the Lubeck and Mason County public service districts in West Virginia, and Little Hocking Water Association, city of Belpre, Tuppers Plains -- Chester Water District and Pomeroy, all in Ohio.

Residents who apply and are found to qualify would be paid $150. If they take part in two blood tests, they would be paid an additional $250, for a total of $400.

The incremental payments will serve as an incentive for a higher level of participation in the study, which is needed to detect C8's potential effects on people who drank the water, said the plaintiffs' attorney, Harry Deitzler.

"That gets the answer to the question everyone wants to know: 'What does C8 do or not do to me?''' he said.

The testing itself costs $546. So, the total cost of testing each person is $946.

DuPont continues to deny any wrongdoing but decided to enter into the agreement because of the time and expense of litigation, said Laurence Jannsen, the company's attorney.

Allowing independent scientists to examine the alleged effect of C8 is preferable to leaving it to the legal system, Jannsen said.
"This is a case that cries out to be decided by science,'' he said.

If any of the $70 million is left over, it will be distributed equally among the participants, unless the amount per person would be less than $25. In that case, the money would be donated to the Good Samaritan Clinic in Parkersburg, according to the settlement.

In all, DuPont will pay at least $107.6 million to settle the class action lawsuit over polluted water supplies near its Washington Works plant, which is located on the Ohio River about seven miles southwest of Parkersburg.

Under the agreement, DuPont will offer to provide the six local drinking water utilities with new treatment equipment to reduce C8 in their water supplies. The company will also fund a $5 million independent study to determine if C8 makes people sick, and pay $22.6 million in legal fees and expenses for residents who sued.

Eventually, DuPont could be forced to spend another $235 million on a program to monitor the health of residents who were exposed to the chemical.
Participation in the lawsuit does not rule out future litigation against DuPont if the scientific panel finds C8 harmful.

In July, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency alleged that DuPont repeatedly failed over a 20-year period to submit required information about C8. The EPA is seeking millions of dollars in fines for violations of the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The company is challenging the fines.