FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK PESTICIDE PROJECT
Return to FAN's Pesticide Homepage
Return to Index Pages for:
Fluroxypyr
1-methylheptyl ester
Fluroxypyr
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2002/September/Day-25/p24093.htm
[Federal Register: September 25, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 186)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 60142-60146]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25se02-8]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-2002-0234; FRL-7198-3]
Fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester; Pesticide Tolerances for
Emergency Exemptions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes time-limited tolerances for
combined residues of fluroxypyr [1-methylheptyl ester 1-methylheptyl
((4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy)acetate]
and its
metabolite fluroxypyr [((4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-
pyridinyl)oxy)acetic acid]
in or on sorghum, grain at 0.035 parts per
million (ppm); sorghum, forage at 2.0 ppm; and sorghum, grain, stover
at 4.0 ppm. This action is in connection with a crisis exemption
declared by the state of Kansas under section 18 of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing use of
the pesticide on sorghum. This regulation establishes maximum
permissible levels for residues of fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester and
its metabolite, all expressed as fluroxypyr in these food commodities.
The tolerances will expire and are revoked on December 31, 2005.
DATES: This regulation is effective September 25, 2002. Objections and
requests for hearings, identified by docket ID number OPP-2002-0234,
must be received on or before November 25, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests may be submitted by
mail, in person, or by courier. Please follow the detailed instructions
for each method as provided in Unit VII. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, your objections and
hearing requests must identify docket ID number OPP-2002-0234 in the
subject line on the first page of your response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Libby Pemberton, Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 308-9364; e-mail address: sec-18-
Mailbox@epamail.epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected categories and entities may include, but are not
limited to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of
Categories NAICS Codes Potentially
Affected Entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry 111 Crop production
112 Animal production
311 Food manufacturing
32532 Pesticide
manufacturing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of This
Document and Other Related Documents?
1. Electronically. You may obtain electronic copies of this
document, and certain other related documents that might be available
electronically, from the EPA Internet home page at http://www.epa.gov/.
To access this document, on the home page select ``Laws and
Regulations,'' ``Regulations and Proposed Rules,'' and then look up the
entry for this document under the ``Federal Register--Environmental
Documents.'' You can also go directly to the Federal Register listings
at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic
version of 40 CFR part 180 is available at http://www.access.gpo.gov/
nara/cfr/cfrhtml_00/Title_40/40cfr180_00.html, a beta site currently
under development.
2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for
this action under docket ID number OPP-2002-0234. The official record
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, and
other information related to this action, including any information
claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). This official
record includes the documents that are physically located in the
docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those
documents. The public version of the official record does not include
any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official
record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic
comments submitted during an applicable comment period is available for
inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch
(PIRIB), Rm. 119, Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy.,
Arlington, VA, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
EPA, on its own initiative, in accordance with sections 408(e) and
408(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a, is establishing tolerances for combined residues of the
herbicide fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester, [1-methylheptyl ((4-amino-
3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy)acetate]
and its metabolite
fluroxypyr [((4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy)acetic
acid], in or on sorghum, grain at 0.035 ppm; sorghum, forage at 2.0
ppm; and sorghum, grain, stover at 4.0 ppm. These tolerances will
expire and are revoked on December 31, 2005. EPA will publish a
document in the Federal Register to remove the revoked tolerances from
the Code of Federal Regulations.
Section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA requires EPA to establish a time-
limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for
pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a
pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under section 18
of FIFRA. Such tolerances can be established without providing notice
or period for public comment. EPA does not intend for its actions on
section 18 related tolerances to set binding precedents for the
application of section 408 and the new safety standard to other
tolerances and exemptions. Section 408(e) of the FFDCA allows EPA to
establish a tolerance or an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance on its own initiative, i.e., without having received any
petition from an outside party.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical
[[Page 60143]]
residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is
``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to mean that
``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all
anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there
is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking
water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational
exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Section 18 of FIFRA authorizes EPA to exempt any Federal or State
agency from any provision of FIFRA, if EPA determines that ``emergency
conditions exist which require such exemption.'' This provision was not
amended by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). EPA has established
regulations governing such emergency exemptions in 40 CFR part 166.
III. Emergency Exemption for Fluroxypyr on Sorghum and FFDCA Tolerances
Due primarily to unusual drought conditions, registered alternative
herbicides have proven ineffective. Drought conditions have resulted in
poor activation of preemegence herbicides. Available post emergence
herbicides are proving ineffective due to the drought hardened
condition of the kochia infestations. Kansas has declared a crisis
exemption under FIFRA section 18 for the use of fluroxypyr on sorghum
for control of kochia.
As part of its assessment of this emergency exemption, EPA assessed
the potential risks presented by residues of fluroxypyr in or on
sorghum, grain and its associated commodities. In doing so, EPA
considered the safety standard in FFDCA section 408(b)(2), and EPA
decided that the necessary tolerance under FFDCA section 408(l)(6)
would be consistent with the safety standard and with FIFRA section 18.
Consistent with the need to move quickly on the emergency exemption in
order to address an urgent non-routine situation and to ensure that the
resulting food is safe and lawful, EPA is issuing this tolerance
without notice and opportunity for public comment as provided in
section 408(l)(6). Although this tolerance will expire and is revoked
on December 31, 2005, under FFDCA section 408(l)(5), residues of the
pesticide not in excess of the amounts specified in the tolerances
remaining in or on sorghum, grain and its associated commodities after
that date will not be unlawful, provided the pesticide is applied in a
manner that was lawful under FIFRA, and the residues do not exceed a
level that was authorized by these tolerances at the time of that
application. EPA will take action to revoke these tolerances earlier if
any experience with, scientific data on, or other relevant information
on this pesticide indicate that the residues are not safe.
Because these tolerances are being approved under emergency
conditions, EPA has not made any decisions about whether fluroxypyr
meets EPA's registration requirements for use on sorghum or whether
permanent tolerances for this use would be appropriate. Under these
circumstances, EPA does not believe that these tolerances serve as a
basis for registration of fluroxypyr by a State for special local needs
under FIFRA section 24(c). Nor do these tolerances serve as the basis
for any State other than Kansas to use this pesticide on this crop
under section 18 of FIFRA without following all provisions of EPA's
regulations implementing section 18 as identified in 40 CFR part 166.
For additional information regarding the emergency exemption for
fluroxypyr, contact the Agency's Registration Division at the address
provided under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 and a complete description of
the risk assessment process, see the final rule on Bifenthrin Pesticide
Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL-5754-7).
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of
fluroxypyr and to make a determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2), for a time-limited tolerance for
combined residues of fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester, [1-methylheptyl
((4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy)acetate]
and its
metabolite furoxypyr [((4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-
pyridinyl)oxy)acetic acid], in or on sorghum, grain at 0.035 ppm;
sorghum, forage at 2.0 ppm; and sorghum, grain, stover at 4.0 ppm. The
most recent estimated aggregate risks resulting from the use of
fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester are discussed in the Federal Register
for September 17, 2001 (66 FR 47964) (FRL-6798-5) Final Rule,
establishing tolerances for residues of the combined residues of the
herbicide fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester and its metabolite
fluroxypyr, free and conjugated, all expressed as fluroxypyr, in or on
grass, forage at 120 ppm, grass, hay at 160 ppm, and modifying the
permanent tolerances for milk from 0.1 ppm to 0.30 ppm and for kidney
(cattle, goat, hog, horse, and sheep) from 0.5 ppm to 1.5 ppm because
in that prior action, risks were estimated assuming tolerance level
residues in all commodities for established tolerances, as well as
those for which action was being proposed, such as in this sorghum
exemption use. Refer to the September 17, 2001 Federal Register (66 FR
47964) document for a detailed discussion of the aggregate risk
assessments and determination of safety. EPA relies upon that risk
assessment and the findings made in the Federal Register document in
support of this action. Below is a brief summary of the aggregate risk
assessment.
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. A summary of the toxicological dose and endpoints for
fluroxypyr for use in human risk assessment is discussed in Unit IV.A.
of the Federal Register of September 17, 2001 (66 FR 47964).
EPA assessed risk scenarios for fluroxypyr under acute, chronic,
and short- and intermediate-term exposures. The Dietary Exposure
Evaluation Model (DEEM[reg]) analysis evaluated the individual food
consumption as reported by respondents in the USDA 1989-1992 nationwide
Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII) and
accumulated exposure to the chemical for each commodity.
The following assumptions were made for the acute exposure
assessments: Tolerance level residues were assumed and it was also
assumed that 100% of the crops and other commodities with proposed or
established fluroxypyr tolerances contained those residues. Anticipated
residues, and percent crop treated (PCT) values of less than 100%, were
not used.
[[Page 60144]]
Using these exposure assessments, EPA concluded that fluroxypyr
exposure from food consumption will occupy 1.5% of the acute population
adjusted dose (aPAD) for females 13-50 years old, the only population
sub-group of concern. A dose and endpoint were not selected for the
U.S. population, including infants and children because there were no
effects observed in oral toxicology studies including maternal toxicity
in the developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits that are
attributable to a single exposure (dose). Therefore, a risk assessment
is not required for this population subgroup.
In addition, despite the potential for acute dietary exposure to
fluroxypyr in drinking water, after calculating drinking water levels
of concern (DWLOCs) and comparing them to conservative model estimated
environmental concentrations (EECs) of fluroxypyr in surface water and
ground water, EPA does not expect the aggregate exposure to exceed 100%
of the aPAD, as shown in the following Table 1.
Table 1.--Aggregate Risk Assessment for Acute Exposure to Fluroxypyr
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surface Ground
Population Subgroup aPAD (mg/ % aPAD Water EEC Water EEC Acute DWLOC
kg) (Food) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Females (13 to 50 years) 0.33 1.5 7.6 0.017 9,700
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following assumptions were made for the chronic exposure
assessments: Tolerance level residues were assumed and it was also
assumed that 100% of the crops and other commodities with proposed or
established fluroxypyr tolerances contained those residues. Anticipated
residues, and PCT values of less than 100%, were not used.
Using these exposure assumptions EPA concluded that exposure to
fluroxypyr from food will utilize 0.6% of the chronic population
adjusted dose (cPAD) for the U.S. population, 0.4% of the cPAD for
females 13 to 50 years and 2.1% of the cPAD for children 1 to 6 years,
the subpopulation at greatest exposure. Based on the use pattern,
chronic residential exposure to residues of fluroxypyr is not expected.
In addition, there is potential for chronic dietary exposure to
fluroxypyr in drinking water. After calculating DWLOCs and comparing
them to the EECs for surface and ground water, EPA does not expect the
aggregate exposure to exceed 100% of the cPAD, as shown in the
following Table 2:
Table 2.--Aggregate Risk Assessment for Chronic (Non-Cancer) Exposure to Fluroxypyr
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surface Ground
Population Subgroup cPAD mg/kg/ %cPAD Water EEC Water EEC Chronic
day (Food) (ppb) (ppb) DWLOC (ppb)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Population 0.50 0.6 1.6 0.017 17,000
--------------------------------------------------------------
Females (13 to 50 years) 0.50 0.4 1.6 0.017 15,000
--------------------------------------------------------------
Children (1 to 6 years) 0.50 2.1 1.6 0.017 4,900
--------------------------------------------------------------
Seniors 55+ 0.50 0.4 1.6 0.017 17,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Short-term aggregate exposure takes into account residential
exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water (considered to be a
background exposure level). Fluroxypyr is not registered for use on any
sites that would result in residential exposure. Therefore, the
aggregate risk is the sum of the risk from food and water, which were
previously addressed.
Intermediate-term aggregate exposure takes into account non-
dietary, non-occupational exposure plus chronic exposure to food and
water (considered to be a background exposure level). Fluroxypyr is not
registered for use on any sites that would result in residential
exposure. Therefore, the aggregate risk is the sum of the risk from
food and water, which were previously addressed.
The Agency has classified fluroxypyr as ``not likely'' to be a
human carcinogen, therefore this risk assessment is not required.
Based on these risk assessments, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general
population, and to infants and children from aggregate exposure to
fluroxypyr residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology is available to enforce the
tolerance expression. The method may be requested from: Calvin Furlow,
PRRIB, IRSD (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-5229; e-mail address:
furlow.calvin@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
No Codex, Canadian, or Mexican maximum residue levels (MRLs) have
been established for residues of fluroxypyr in or on these commodities.
Therefore, no tolerance discrepancies exist between countries for this
chemical.
VI. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance is established for combined residues of
fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester, [1-methylheptyl ((4-amino-3,5-
dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy)acetate]
and its metabolite furoxypyr
[((4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy) acetic acid], in or
on sorghum, grain at 0.035 ppm; sorghum, forage at 2.0 ppm; and
sorghum, grain, stover at 4.0 ppm.
VII. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may
[[Page 60145]]
file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request
a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those regulations require
some modification to reflect the amendments made to the FFDCA by the
FQPA of 1996, EPA will continue to use those procedures, with
appropriate adjustments, until the necessary modifications can be made.
The new section 408(g) provides essentially the same process for
persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d), as
was provided in the old FFDCA sections 408 and 409. However, the period
for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number OPP-2002-0210 in the subject line on the
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before November
25, 2002.
1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27).
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900C),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. You may also deliver your written request to
the Office of the Hearing Clerk in Rm. 104, Crystal Mall #2,
1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. The Office of the Hearing
Clerk is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Office of the Hearing
Clerk is (703) 603-0061.
2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file an objection or request a
hearing, you must also pay the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i) or
request a waiver of that fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You must
mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, Office
of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please
identify the fee submission by labeling it ``Tolerance Petition Fees.''
EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement ``when in the
judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is equitable and
not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For additional
information regarding the waiver of these fees, you may contact James
Tompkins by phone at (703) 305-5697, by e-mail at tompkins.jim@epa.gov,
or by mailing a request for information to Mr. Tompkins at Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001.
If you would like to request a waiver of the tolerance objection
fees, you must mail your request for such a waiver to: James Hollins,
Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
3. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VII.A., you
should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion
in the official record that is described in Unit I.B.2. Mail your
copies, identified by the docket ID number OPP-2002-0210, to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and
Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the
PIRIB described in Unit I.B.2. You may also send an electronic copy of
your request via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII
file format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of
encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will
also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file format.
Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an
electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40
CFR 178.32).
VIII. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
This final rule establishes time-limited tolerances under FFDCA
section 408. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted
these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order
12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor
does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994);
or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration
of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA),
Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a FIFRA
section 18 exemption under FFDCA section 408, such as the tolerances in
[[Page 60146]]
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal implications'' as
described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (59 FR 22951, November 6,
2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.''
``Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive
Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.''
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this rule.
IX. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 13, 2002.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a) and 371.
2. Section 180.535 is amended by alphabetically adding the
following commodities to the table in paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.535 Fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester; tolerances for
residues.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per Expiration/
Commodity million revocation date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Sorghum, grain, forage............ 2.0 12/31/05
Sorghum, grain, grain............. 0.035 12/31/05
Sorghum, grain, stover............ 4.0 12/31/05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 02-24093 Filed 9-24-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S