Fluridone - CAS No. 59756-60-4. Local Battles.
August 26, 2005. Maddocks: Time for a new treatment.
By Philip Maddocks.
Natick Bulletin & Tab (Massachussets).

 
 
Return to Index for
Local Battles
Fluridone

 

http://www.townonline.com/natick/opinion/view.bg?articleid=312129

August 26, 2005

Natick Bulletin & Tab (Massachussets)

Maddocks: Time for a new treatment

By Philip Maddocks

The state Department of Conservation and Recreation's proposal to check the spread of milfoil in Lake Cochituate with herbicides has been held up so long in appeal that the state agency, known as the Department of Environmental Management back in 2003 when it filed its original plan with the Natick Conservation Commission, has in the interim changed its name as well as its proposal.

But the new plan and the newly-named agency both seemed headed for the same fate as the previous ones.

That's because no one knows for certain what affect the chemical treatment might have on people who use the water in the lake and from the nearby public water supply. And as we've seen its the lack of knowledge more often than understanding that leads to intransigence.

No one seems to know of any documented health problems, but that seems to be as far as it goes. Take your pick, is it the absence of evidence or the evidence of absence.

The DCR, which owns Lake Cochituate, has made theirs. It said last week that further growth of milfoil has rendered its original plan inadequate. Thus it is planning to ask the Natick Conservation Commission for permission to use an expanded herbicide treatment program.

"If we had been allowed to do what we sought to do last year, the problem would have been solved," Joe O'Keefe, spokesman for the DCR, told the MetroWest Daily News last week. "Now we have an even larger scale of (milfoil)."

This is coming from the same agency that said it discovered milfoil in Lake Cochituate in May 2002 but waited until September of that year before installing floating mesh netting, known as vegetation barriers, between the three main ponds of the lake to help slow the spread of the fast-growing milfoil. And it waited until May of the following year to bring a treatment proposal before the town's Conservation Commission.

Now the DCR, whose original proposal called for using the chemicals diquat bromide and endothall, will likely file an application next month with the Conservation Commission that will include a proposal to use the herbicide fluridone, the same chemical that Wellelsey's Natural Resource Committee voted against using in the town's weed-infested Morse's Pond in June because the town's Integrated Pest Management Policy prohibits the use of herbicides and pesticides on public land or public water supplies, unless there is a direct danger to human health or environmental health, and where no other viable alternatives exist.

In Natick the DCR won't have to contend with any Pest Management Policy but it will have to contend with the same pests who appealed the agency's original plan and will likely appeal any new one that calls for the use of herbicides.

 "Do we really want to add more chemicals on top of those that already exist? I really doubt it," said Carole Berkowitz, a lakeside resident who is treasurer of POWR (Protect Our Water Resources), a group formed to oppose herbicide use in Cochituate, whose presence at the lake last week seemed to suggest trouble for the DCR on both the political and acronymal fronts.

POWR gathered at Lake Cochituate on Aug. 17 along with Toxics Action Center of Boston and a group of kids from a South Middlesex Opportunity Council program to voice their opposition to the use herbicides that they see to as a threat to Natick's drinking water, much of which is drawn from a wellhead area along the eastern shoreline of the lake's South Pond.

While the children held signs with messages like "keep our lake safe" and "weed killers kill animals too," the adults clung to the idea that unless the state used the chemicals on them first, its new treatment plan would never get off the ground - or at least into the water.

With another treatment stalemate seemingly imminent, and with some estimating that the milfoil has spread to 120 of the lake's 625 acres, it appears that the milfoil is here to stay for the time being.

Most of the experts say that hand-pulling the weed is only effective when its infestation is limited. But Americans can a remarkably industrious people if given a good reason to work.

So I wonder what would happen if the DCR had their own group of kids posted along Rte. 9 holding signs with the message: "Milfoil, the natural Viagra" or "Because you're worth it, the weed that kills any sign of aging."

The possibilities - and the possible harvesters - are endless.

But it might be a question of ridding one invasive species for another. The presence of this species, though, may have the advantage of bringing unanimity of thought on the appropriateness of chemical treatments .

Philip Maddocks can be reached at 508-626-4437 or by e-mail at pmaddock@cnc.com.

 
Fluoride Action Network | Pesticide Project | 315-379-9200 | pesticides@fluoridealert.org