FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK
PESTICIDE PROJECT

Return to FAN's Pesticide Homepage

Return to PFOA Class Action Suit

Return to Newspaper articles and Documents related to this Class Action

C8 or C-8: PFOA is perfluorooctanoic acid and is sometimes called C8. It is a man-made chemical and does not occur naturally in the environment. The "PFOA" acronym is used to indicate not only perfluorooctanoic acid itself, but also its principal salts.
The PFOA derivative of greatest concern and most wide spread use is the ammonium salt (
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate) commonly known as C8, C-8, or APFO and the chemical of concern in the Class Action suit in Ohio.

Ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO or C8)
CAS No. 3825-26-1. Molecular formula:

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA or C8)
CAS No: 335-67-1
. Molecular formula:

The DuPont site where APFO is used as a reaction aid is the Washington Works (Route 892, Washington, West Virginia 26181) located along the Ohio River approximately seven miles southwest of Parkersburg, West Virginia.

The Little Hocking Water Association well field is located in Ohio on the north side of the Ohio River immediately across from the Washington Works facility. Consumers of this drinking water have brought a Class Action suit against the Association and DuPont for the contamination of their drinking water with DuPont's APFO, which residents and media refer to as C8.

PFOA is used as a processing aid in the manufacture of fluoropolymers to produce hundreds of items such as non-stick surfaces on cookware (TEFLON), protective finishes on carpets (SCOTCHGUARD, STAINMASTER), clothing (GORE-TEX), and the weather-resistant barrier sheeting used on homes under the exterior siding (TYVEK).

 

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/letters/articles/2004/08/21/eliminate_the_use_of_teflon/

August 21, 2004

Boston Globe [Letter]

Eliminate the use of Teflon

I AGREE with the Aug. 16 editorial "Teflon Questions" that we shouldn't throw out our Teflon pans, and that we should send them back to Du Pont and let it deal with the disposal problems! Clearly, there is a problem when these man-made, resistant, persistent chemicals show up in our drinking water, our blood, and in such remote locations as the Arctic.

We should not wait any longer to eliminate the use of these chemicals when we already know enough, and safer alternatives exist that will do the job.

Not only did Du Pont fail in its reporting obligations, our government's delay in taking action has exposed us to unnecessary risks.

PFOA Teflon and its cousins, PFOS and the new Scotchgard, all have the halogen fluorine in them. Other halogenated compounds we are now unfortunately familiar with include another Du Pont product, the ozone-depleting CFCs, as well as the highly toxic PCBs, and the brominated flame retardants that have garnered attention in the past few years because of health effects that have led to phaseouts in the European Union and at home (California, Maine, Hawaii).

Avoiding the use of these miracle chemicals is the only way to protect our health and the health of our children.

MYRIAM LAURA BEAULNE
New Salem

The writer is a biologist.