FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK
PESTICIDE PROJECT

Return to FAN's Pesticide Homepage

Return to PFOA Class Action Suit

Return to Newspaper articles and Documents related to this Class Action

C8 or C-8: PFOA is perfluorooctanoic acid and is sometimes called C8. It is a man-made chemical and does not occur naturally in the environment. The "PFOA" acronym is used to indicate not only perfluorooctanoic acid itself, but also its principal salts.
The PFOA derivative of greatest concern and most wide spread use is the ammonium salt (
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate) commonly known as C8, C-8, or APFO and the chemical of concern in the Class Action suit in Ohio.

Ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO or C8)
CAS No. 3825-26-1. Molecular formula:

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA or C8)
CAS No: 335-67-1
. Molecular formula:

The DuPont site where APFO is used as a reaction aid is the Washington Works (Route 892, Washington, West Virginia 26181) located along the Ohio River approximately seven miles southwest of Parkersburg, West Virginia.

The Little Hocking Water Association well field is located in Ohio on the north side of the Ohio River immediately across from the Washington Works facility. Consumers of this drinking water have brought a Class Action suit against the Association and DuPont for the contamination of their drinking water with DuPont's APFO, which residents and media refer to as C8.

PFOA is used as a processing aid in the manufacture of fluoropolymers to produce hundreds of items such as non-stick surfaces on cookware (TEFLON), protective finishes on carpets (SCOTCHGUARD, STAINMASTER), clothing (GORE-TEX), and the weather-resistant barrier sheeting used on homes under the exterior siding (TYVEK).

 

http://www.mariettatimes.com/news/story/079202004_new03duprfts.asp

The Marietta Times (Ohio)
 
Friday, July 09, 2004

Fine not likely to hurt DuPont's profits

By Connie Cartmell, ccartmell@mariettatimes.com

When a corporation boasts an annual revenue of $27 billion, as DuPont did in 2003, even a maximum $300 million fine for misconduct is a drop in the bucket.

Experts doubt any fine by the U.S. Enviromental Protection Agency will affect the company, overall, in an adverse financial way.

But a string of expected protests is expected from the company before any dollars change hands. Being in "hot water" doesn't mean this company is cooked - just on the front burner.

"I haven't heard all the details yet, but this (announcement) should not affect them at all unless it leads to a large number of class action suits," said Robert Voisinet, a certified financial planner (CFP) with Raymond James Financial Services, 132 Fourth St.

The EPA announced it will fine DuPont anywhere from $1 million to $300 million for its failure to comply with the technical reporting requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the Resource Conservation Recovery Act regarding C8 or PFOA.

The chemical is an essential processing aid in producing fluoropolymers. It is a main ingredient in the manufacture of Teflon, used in hundreds of applications, well-known as the cooking surface of frying pans.

Voisinet isn't expecting a financial ripple fromThursday's announcement and is advising clients to sit tight. There is no reason to sell DuPont stock, he said.

"Their stock went down 20 cents today (Thursday), but that is not a significant change," he said. "I don't see this (fine) as any reason to sell. I would not expect the fine, even if it is the maximum, to impact this company at all."

Voisinet's advice to stockholders is "hang on."

"If the stock continues to drop some, this also represents a buying opportunity," he said.
DuPont, with close to 2,000 employees at its Washington Works plant near Parkersburg, denies the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency claim.

The company stands by earlier statements that there have been no human health effects from the chemical.

In April, DuPont itself announced an employee health survey, called the most comprehensive ever conducted, to determine if C8 has an adverse health effect on its workers. Results of a study of more than 750 workers are expected to be announced in September.

Environmentalists are closely watching the EPA's complaint against DuPont, and the issued fines.
"The amount of the fines is pretty miniscule with regard to DuPont's whole revenue picture," said Staci Putney of the Ohio Environmental Council in Columbus.

But she sees a positive side.

"They are now being watched and the water is being carefully monitored," Putney said. "The public is aware. It's good to have some action."

When EPA fines are levied, it means the company is given notice to "clean up their act," she said.
"This will only benefit public health," Putney said.

The Ohio Environmental Council is a statewide environmental watchdog group.

DuPont was founded in 1802, as an explosives company. It was 100 years later when the company focus turned to chemicals, materials, and energy.

Another environmental watchdog group, the Environmental Working Group out of Washington, D.C., called the lack of a specific fine " a slap on the wrist" and further indication that the federal EPA is weak when it comes to taking a stand against big business. In a press release the group said DuPont earns $200 million a year through its Teflon and other C-8 related products. The EWG has called for the EPA to fine DuPont the maximum amount.

DuPont at a glance

• 2003 revenues: $27 billion.

• Employees worldwide: 77,000.

• Employees at Washington Works: 2,000.

• Global: Operating in 70 countries.

• Fortune 500: 67th largest U.S. industrial/service corporation.

• Founding: 1802, primarily an explosives company.

Brands: Includes the DuPont Oval and DuPont trademarks, Pioneer brand seeds, Teflon, fluoropolymers, films, fabric protectors, fibers and dispersions, Corian solid surfaces, Kevlar, high strength materials, and Tyvek, protective material.

Source: DuPont.com