FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK
PESTICIDE PROJECT

Return to FAN's Pesticide Homepage

Return to PFOA Class Action Suit

Return to Newspaper articles and Documents related to PFOA Class Action

C8 or C-8: PFOA is perfluorooctanoic acid and is sometimes called C8. It is a man-made chemical and does not occur naturally in the environment. The "PFOA" acronym is used to indicate not only perfluorooctanoic acid itself, but also its principal salts.
The PFOA derivative of greatest concern and most wide spread use is the ammonium salt (
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate) commonly known as C8, C-8, or APFO and the chemical of concern in the Class Action suit in Ohio.

Ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO or C8)
CAS No. 3825-26-1. Molecular formula:

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA or C8)
CAS No: 335-67-1
. Molecular formula:

The DuPont site where APFO is used as a reaction aid is the Washington Works (Route 892, Washington, West Virginia 26181) located along the Ohio River approximately seven miles southwest of Parkersburg, West Virginia.

The Little Hocking Water Association well field is located in Ohio on the north side of the Ohio River immediately across from the Washington Works facility. Consumers of this drinking water have brought a Class Action suit against the Association and DuPont for the contamination of their drinking water with DuPont's APFO, which residents and media refer to as C8.

PFOA is used as a processing aid in the manufacture of fluoropolymers to produce hundreds of items such as non-stick surfaces on cookware (TEFLON), protective finishes on carpets (SCOTCHGUARD, STAINMASTER), clothing (GORE-TEX), and the weather-resistant barrier sheeting used on homes under the exterior siding (TYVEK).

 

http://www.ewg.org/issues/PFCs/20041216/index.php

December 16, 2004

From the Environmental Working Group

DuPont Fails to Report Another Teflon Health Study
High Cholesterol Levels in Teflon Workers Kept from EPA

Recently, lawyers for an American chemical company called MIC Specialty Chemicals, Inc. gave the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data about workers whose blood is polluted with the Teflon chemical that has prompted a lawsuit and what EPA has called 'the most extensive scientific investigation ever undertaken on this type of chemical.' This new data shows that workers in Italy with the Teflon chemical in their blood had increased total cholesterol levels, a major risk factor for heart attack and stroke (View PDF document: MIC submission and Italian study reference).

Teflon maker DuPont repeatedly claims there are 'no known health effects' associated with the Teflon chemical. But this new cholesterol study is the third in a series of studies conducted since 1994 pointing to excess risks for stroke and heart attack among workers exposed to the Teflon chemical. In worker blood studies conducted by 3M Corporation between 1994 and 2000, scientists also found excess total cholesterol levels among Teflon-exposed workers, and in 2001 3M published a study showing that workers exposed to the Teflon chemical for between five and 10 years face a risk of dying of stroke 15 times higher than non-exposed workers (Olsen et al. 2001a, 2001b; Alexander, 2001). 3M manufactured the Teflon chemical and supplied it to DuPont until 2002, when DuPont began its own production. Scientists from both 3M and DuPont were briefed on the new cholesterol findings last Feburary and again in June of this year. Both companies failed to submit the new data to EPA.

The EPA is trying to figure out how this indestructible Teflon chemical has gotten into over 95% of Americans' blood; it is also suing DuPont for hiding health data for over 20 years. The court case begins on December 16.

Timeline

1987-2003. An American company called MIC Specialty Chemicals, Inc imports the Teflon chemical from an Italian company that makes it, called Miteni. Miteni's blood data of the past 17 years shows a slight increase of total cholesterol in the workers, corresponding to elevated cholesterol found in both monkeys and 3M workers exposed to the Teflon chemicals.

December 2003.In December 2003, Miteni's researcher, a professor Giovanni Costa, sent blood data to 3M for review. In February 2004, he met with 3M and DuPont experts to discuss this blood data. Professor Costa then sent 3M and DuPont more blood data, including some from this past spring. Costa's memo states that DuPont expert Robert Rickard was scheduled in August to have a 'FYI' meeting with EPA to discuss Teflon chemicals.

September 21, 2004. DuPont finally sent the data to EPA on September 21, 2004, more than 200 days after the legal reporting deadline under the Toxic Substances Control Act for studies that indicates 'substantial risk of injury to health.' This failure to report carries a maximum fine of $27,500 per day, or more than $6 million in this case.*

*source: Length of time between February 15, 2004 and September 21, 2004 is 219 days. 219 days times $27,500/day = $6,022,500.

References

Alexander, B. 2001. Mortality study of workers employed at the 3M Cottage Grove Facility. Final Report. Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota. AR 226-1136. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Olsen GW, Burlew MM, Burris JM, Mandel JH. 2001a. A cross-sectional analysis of serum perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in relation to clinical chemistry, thyroid hormone, hematology and urinalysis results from male and female employee participants of the 2000 Antwerp and Decatur fluorochemical medical surveillance program. Final report. 3M medical department.

Olsen GW, Burlew MM, Burris JM, Mandel JH. 2001b. A longitudinal analysis of serum perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in relation to lipid and hepatic clinical chemistry test results from male employee participants of the 1994/95, 1997, and 2000 fluorochemical medical surveillance program. 3M final report.