Fluoride Action Network
July 5, 2005
Group to Protest at Fluoridation’s
60th Birthday Party in Chicago
Burlington, Vt. -- The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) will protest
during the July 13th “Celebration
of 60 Years of Community Water Fluoridation” ceremony
held jointly by the American Dental Association (ADA) and the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Chicago’s Millennium
Park, Chase Promenade South, (between Randolph and Monroe Streets)
beginning at 10 am.
FAN members with signs, walking books and a singer will begin at
9:30 am.
Following the demonstration and ceremony, chemistry professor Paul
Connett, PhD, FAN’s Executive Director, will appear at the
Barnes & Noble DePaul Center (Corner of State and Jackson) at
1 pm to educate Chicagoans about the health dangers associated with
their fluoridated water supply.
Dr. Connett will also discuss the new book, “The
Fluoride Deception,” by Chris Bryson, exposing the politics,
and conflict of interest, underlying the promotion of fluoridation.
William
Hirzy, PhD, Environmental Protection Agency scientist and David
Kennedy, DDS, Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, along with a representative
of the newly-formed group, Chicago Citizens Against Fluoridation,
will join Dr. Connett.
FAN will also protest the ADA’s and CDC’s three-day
fluoridation strategy symposium at the ADA Headquarters, 211 East
Chicago Avenue, from July 14 – 16 (starting at 8:30 am)
Ignoring fluoridation’s dangers the ADA/CDC presenters will
coach attendees to initiate and retain fluoridation at the state
and local levels throughout the United States. FAN members will
greet symposium-goers with signs, posters and literature explaining
fluoridation’s harm outside ADA Headquarters on July 14 and
15.
A May 19 request to CDC Director, Dr. Julie L. Gerberding, to allow
a FAN presentation of fluoridation’s hazards at this partially
taxpayer-funded event, was ignored.
“Dentists should apologize for fluoridation; not celebrate
it,” says Paul Connett, PhD, Executive Director, Fluoride
Action Network.
“If this was 1945, when fluoridation began, we could excuse
the ignorance. But modern science clearly shows the risks far outweigh
the benefits of fluoridation,” says Connett. “It is
dangerous and absurd to continue force-feeding fluoride chemicals
into every person in the country via their water supply,”
says Connett.
The CDC concedes that fluoride’s intended decay-reducing
benefit is from topical application, not from ingestion. “Thus,”
says Connett, “ingesting fluoride makes as much sense as swallowing
sunblock to prevent skin cancer.”
American children are fluoride-overdosed reports the Journal of
the ADA, whether or not they live in fluoridated communities. (1)
Dental fluorosis - white spotted, yellow or brown permanently stained
teeth - is the only visible sign of fluoride toxicity. However,
published reports link fluoride to bone, kidney, thyroid, and brain
damage.
In June, the Environmental Working Group called for a government
inquiry into a Harvard scientist’s suppression of his student’s
PhD thesis linking fluoride to higher rates of osteosarcoma, a frequently
fatal bone cancer, in boys during early childhood. (2)
Impure and untested silicofluoride chemicals, waste products of
phosphate fertilizer manufacturing, are used by over 91% of U.S.
fluoridating communities. Recent research links fluoridation chemicals
to children’s higher blood lead levels. (3a-c)
Fluoridation chemicals together with the newer water disinfectant,
chloramine, have also been shown to leach lead from home plumbing
systems. (4)
The Fluoride Action Network is an international coalition working
to broaden public awareness about fluoride's impact on human health
and the environment.
For more information, email:
chicago@fluoridealert.org or call 802-355-0999 | 315-379-9200
References:
(1) “Prevalence and trends in enamel fluorosis in the United
States from the 1930s to the 1980s,” J Am Dent Assoc., Feb.
2002 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2) Environmental Working Group, “Harvard Fluoride Findings
Misrepresented?,” accessed 7/4/05
http://www.ewg.org/issues/fluoride/20050627/index.php
(3) a) Masters R, et al. (2000). Association of silicofluoride
treated water with elevated blood lead. Neurotoxicology 21(6): 1091-1099
b) Masters RD, Coplan M. (1999). Water treatment with Silicofluorides
and Lead Toxicity. International Journal of Environmental Studies
56: 435-449
c) Myron J. Coplan and Roger Masters. 2001. "Guest Editorial:
Silicofluorides and fluoridation," Fluoride Quarterly Journal
of the Interantional Society for Fluoride Research, 34: 161-220
(4) The News & Observer, “Water treatment process called
potential risk,” By JERRY ALLEGOOD
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/health_science/story/2417101p-8794959c.html |