Excerpt from:
Ombudsman Report of Findings
and Recommendations Regarding the Stauffer Chemical Company Site
Tarpon Springs, Florida
Prepared by Ronnie D. Wilson, JD, Ombudsman
Edited by Pascale Krumm, PhD
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Atlanta, GA
December 29, 2000.
From the instant the plant became operational,
there were complaints of air pollution. In June 1948, less than
a year after the plant's opening, eight local residents and landowners
filed a nuisance suit (for gases and fumes) in the Federal District
Court for Southern Florida, Tampa. Division (II-1). The suit alleged
that fumes and gases from the operation were adversely impacting
human health and plants, not only in the immediate area, but as
far as 8 miles away, and that,27
noxious gases and fumes escape therefrom through smokestacks
connected with the said plant and by other means and are carried
by the prevailing winds over a radius of some four miles from
the said plant, that the said gases and fumes are highly deleterious
to animal and plant life for the said distance, cause throat irritations
and coughing by persons and animals breathing same and the death
of young fowls, that said gas is especially harmful to teeth
and causes decay and kills and destroys plant
life.3
In his deposition, J.M. Turnpaw alleged that emissions from the
plant not only damaged plants on his property, but also created
problems for his refinishing boat business:
I noticed the lead paints or anything you put on the boats
they would discolor, and sometimes would be spotty or kind
of blurry on the paint and I went over it two or three times to
try to catch it, if it wasn't quite dry... I varnished several
boats like that and noticed the dust and smoke coming from over
there, and you could take hold of it just like a piece of paper
and pull it off the boats.
When asked how long the problem lasted, Turnpaw stated, "That
all depends a good deal on the conditions of the weather and the
winds, and with other conditions. I noticed it more with a west
or northwest wind, I get that gas smell in the atmosphere."27
When asked if the emissions affected his
health, Turnpaw replied, "Mouth dry and tasted like a mouth
full of old copper." When asked if he coughed, Turnpaw answered,
"Quite a bit, yes sir."27
In her deposition, Genevieve Flanagan indicated
that problems with gases and fumes began to be bothersome at her
trailer park in January 1948, causing her to cough and sneeze
and creating complaints from her tenants. She said the following:
We smelled it, to begin with, and could see it, and then many
trees started dying. It killed a lot of them [trees and shrubs]
and it is killing my pine and oak trees as well. All of
the natural pines turned completely red, and two oak trees died
within a week, the water oaks the leaves just burned; the others
lost a lot of their leaves but some of the growth has come back;
I don't know whether they will live or not; and two of the large
water oaks died within that week, and one orange tree died. All
of my palms. As soon as they put out a new leaf by the time they
were out two or three weeks they turned. The plumoso palms, I
trimmed a lot of them, about two weeks, and just as fast as they
put out the new growth they just turned
again.27
Bartley Mickler stated in his deposition
that since the plant opened, he had lost livestock. He indicated
that he lost a lot of pigs and about 100 head of cattle.27
Mickler admitted that it is normal to lose cows in the winter months,
about 10 per year, but he indicated that the past winter
had been 200 to 300 percent worse.27
Mickler also indicated that pine trees on his 5,000-acre property
were affected by the plant. He indicated that in January or February
1948, he noticed pine needles turning red and brown and falling
from the trees.27 His estimate was that at least half
of the trees were impacted. New growth would bud and die back
without being replaced. Mickler stated that less grass and berries
have caused damage to quail and game birds. The grass normally comes
out the first of the year, but prior to the lawsuit, the grass came
out and died, resulting in grass production being down by 40 percent.
Mickler also stated that fumes and gases from the plant settled
on palmetto bushes on his property. Samples from palmettos and pine
from across his property were sent to the state plant board for
analysis.27
Mickler traced the damage based upon the way the smoke from Victor
traveled, at least 7 miles from the plant.27 He described
the smoke this way: "It looks like a hazey gas substance and
you can see it settling for miles and miles through the woods under
the tops of the trees." When asked if you could hold it in
your hand, he answered,
It is filte [sic] red, gassy looking substance that you see settling
on the grass and stuff, and you notice it floating through the
woods and see it gradually settling down. Some of it is a black
substance that you can see in the river. It looks like soot, an
oily substance on the surface of water, and little black particles
that look like soot or something. About three quarters of a mile
from the plant, down towards the mouth of the river, I noticed
it. It goes up and down the river with the tide.27
Bartley Mickler's father, S.E. Mickler was
a well respected individual in the community, having served as constable,
deputy sheriff, police officer, and chief of police. He represented
the interests of his sister and her husband, Arthur and Ethel Glass,
who lived in New York.
Prior to the construction of the plant, Mickler objected to the
possible fumes and dust from the new facility and met with Paul
Crider who worked for Victor. Crider told Mickler that, "You
need not worry about it Mickler, it will not happen here with out
plant."27 Afterwards, in the latter part of January
or early February, "When it commenced killing stuff,"
Mickler asked to meet with mayor Howard, who indicated that he would
call Crider.27 Mickler recounts how nothing was done.
He [mayor Howard] said it looks bad; 'I will take it up with
Mr. Crider right away.' So several times I phoned him and he hadn't
done anything, and I phoned Mr. Beckett, the county commissioner,
about it and he promised to go out and look at it. There was never
anything done about it at all. I came to the commissioners' meeting
and told them about it here and a bunch of us got up a petition
and carried one copy to the city commissioners and one copy to
the Clearwater County commissioners.27
Approximately 300 people signed the petition. Mickler indicated
that around January 1948, he began noticing offensive odors and
harmful effects from the plant. He stated that he had smelled the
odors in Tarpon Springs, and as far as 6 to 7 miles in the pastures.
Mickler stated that, "It has been so thick up there in low
spots when the atmosphere would bring it down that it would be just
like a fog."27
When asked about the smell, Mickler replied,
Well, it don't smell like sulphur. It smells like a burnt phosphate
to me. Of course, knowing that there is phosphate there, it makes
you think of that more than anything else. It makes your throat
dry, and you taste it, and it tastes kind of coppery. I get asthma
from it, just like Mr. Crider stuffed up yesterday. I can go
out here and get into the way the wind is blowing and be in it
three minutes and have to take something for my throat. Yes sir,
I cough.27
Regarding damages to trees, Mickler said,
Well, I came in to dinner in town and I never noticed anything.
When I came back out, and just as I went to make the curve, as
you run by the oil company and go up towards the plant, I noticed
the leaves on the trees being red. I stopped my car and said to
myself, 'darn there has been a fire since I have been along.'
I stopped the car and looked and there wasn't no fire. I observed
the trees had been burned by something, I don't know what.27
Mickler estimated that one-sixth of the trees on his property were
affected. He carried samples of pine needles and palmettos to a
Tampa chemist, who reported that some of the materials showed 300,
400, and 500 parts per million of fluorine. Mickler further
indicated that he helped Archie Clement, Tarpon Springs city attorney,
gather materials and that the city manager had sent the samples
to the State Plant Board in Tallahassee. Representatives of the
Forestry Department visited the Mickler property four or five times.
Mickler recounted that, "They said it had to be fumes or gas
or something. They said it was not the weather, dry or wet."27
According to Mickler, the emissions looked like a fog, and from
a distance an observer could not see through the mixture.27
Trying to describe the emissions which impact the plants, Mickler
stated that,
You can see it on oak or palmetto anywhere in the woods. It is
a kind of dusty concern, although not much dust to it, either.
It looks oily. For instance, on the palmetto, when it first hits
it, it will limber up and look like it has oil on it. It limbers
up a leaf and kind of parches it.27
Paul Crider, plant superintendent, stated
that the plant processed elemental phosphorus, slag, and ferro phosphorus.
Crider stated that since the second unit was started, the plant
employed water scrubbers for the gases, in which water is sprayed
into the gases. Crider did not seem to know much about the process.
When asked "If the cleansing system has not been cut
(turned) on, the gases and fumes will frequently escape, will they
not?" he answered, "I suppose they would."9
Crider was asked the following question: "I notice that, at
your plant there are high, apparently concrete smoke-stacks, and
also what appear to be iron pipes. Do all of the fumes and gases
escape through these smoke-stacks and pipes, or through either one
of them?" Crider replied: "Through either one of them.
That is, they escape from either one, at will. That is, as set by
the operator. Not indiscriminately."9
When asked if he knew anything about the chemical content of
the gases and fumes escaping from the plant, Crider answered, "No
Sir." He was then asked if anyone at the plant knew about
the content, and he answered, "No. Not reliably."9
The questioner then asked for a more detailed explanation, and Crider
answered:
Well, I will say this: in any process where you are burning fuel
it is a matter of knowing how much oxygen you have got in your
waste gases, or how much carbon monoxide, in order to control
the combustion. As far as the operation is concerned, we people
in the operation are not concerned about any other content, and,
therefore we do not know.9
Crider indicated that some complaints had been reported to the
company about the gases and fumes. When asked what changes, if any,
had been made as a result of the complaints or subsequent to them,
he answered, "No physical changes have been made; in a general
sense the procedure has been to improve operation."9
The deposition depicts Crider as someone who has little knowledge
of phosphate or the extraction process. When Crider was asked
four specific questions, he had to return to the stand the next
day with the answers.9
Victor Chemical also submitted to the court the deposition of John
Claypool, an expert witness, questioned only by Victor's attorneys.
Claypool was from West Hempstead, Long Island, New York. He received
a B.S. from DePauw University in Chicago, and took advanced and
special courses in the College of Agriculture at Purdue University,
Indiana, until 1912. He taught pre-vocational and vocational agriculture
and in 1916 went to Southwestern Teachers College as a professor
of agricultural education. In 1920, he worked for a chemical manufacturing
company and a copper smelting company in New York, taking over the
investigation and experimentation of the effects of certain smokes
or gases and fumes. Over the next 30 years Claypool studied the
effects of gases or chemicals in eight states, including Florida.6
Claypool first visited Tarpon Springs on March 1st ,
1947, while the plant was under construction.6 Of the
findings on this visit, he stated,
Vegetation in that vicinity at the time was not in a good state
of growth. There had been an early season of drought, followed
by unseasonably cold weather. Some plants, notably the pines,
showed a scorched appearance of needles in places. It was not
universal... There were dead trees in the vicinity, ...confined
to the pine family... I also found some dead citrus trees in a
small orchard near the Victor site. In looking over plant life
in Tarpon Springs, I covered, as closely as I could without trespassing
or attracting undue attention, within a radius of two miles in
all directions. 6
Claypool estimated that five to 10 percent of the pines in the
area were dead. He also said that he saw two men remove and replace
dead trees in the citrus grove. The workers explained that the trees
had died of either root rot or crown rot and that the orchard had
not been well fertilized or sprayed.6
When asked about the appearance of vegetation, Claypool said,
Vegetation, generally speaking, did not appear to be in a fine,
flourishing condition at all, anywhere... I would not say that
it was universally scorched in appearance. I did not trespass
to examine closely. From the roads, there were signs that there
had been a fire at some time. I was not acquainted with the plant,
I did not know whether this was a seasonal thing, whether fire
brought those conditions about, but that was the condition of
the scrub palmetto at the time... Pale green to yellow.6
Claypool showed photos made at the Mickler property purporting
to display dead trees. The photos were black and white and after
duplication did not provide details of damages. The witness was
careful to establish that no trespass occurred, and indicated that
he approached the property to within 10 yards, and used field glasses
to observe plants and trees for about 1/4 mile.6
On February 18 and 23, 1948, Claypool returned to Tarpon Springs
in response to a request from Victor, because of unrest among neighbors
of the plant and the conditions of vegetation.6 Again,
with the plant in full operation, Claypool surveyed the area for
approximately 2.5 miles in all directions, and describes what he
found on this trip:
In February of 1948, there was some noticeable discoloration
of the tips of pine needles or foliage within a distance of
a half mile in generally southeast or east-southeast direction.
There was, on the date of my arrival, which was the 18th
, some loss of green color on the tips of pine foliage, which
by the 23rd , upon my return, had become a definite
browning of those tips. That appeared to extend almost to
the location of some oil tanks along the Anclote River, which
is less than a half mile from the operating part of the plant...
I continued my close-up inspection by walking along the railroad
tracks to the north and found no evidence of anything unusual
to vegetation in that direction. There was no noticeable damages
to the Flanagan and Turnpaw properties... Foliage (westerly or
northwesterly) appeared to show no change since my visit a year
before... Sunset Hills, the general condition of vegetation appeared
to be better at that time than it had the previous year.6
When asked , "Well from your experience of more than 30
years, did you form any opinion as to the cause of the discoloration
of the pine needles and foliage at Tarpon Springs?" Claypool
answered, "In my opinion, it was caused by a gas or fume...
I believe it was probably from a fluoride compound."6
In May 1948, 2 weeks before the lawsuit was filed, Claypool returned
to the area. He told the questioner,
The pines on what I have later learned was the Mickler property
north of the Victor plant showed, in the case of ten or twelve
trees near the fence, a reddening of needles. These trees
were spread out over a width of 200 to 250 yards. In looking through
the trees along the fence, I could see evidence of fire, but no
evidence of fire near these particular trees.
[Near the Flanagan and Turnpaw properties] There seemed to be
a reddening of pine needles, some loss of green color of broad-leafed
plants, extending in a southeasterly direction from the Victor
plant, affecting the pine trees, which I could see from a distance
up to or almost to what I now understand to be the Flanagan property.6
[Toward Anclote] There seemed to be no evidence of any such condition
as I have just described in the other direction, unless it could
have been right up to the edge of Meyer's Cove, which is the Meyers'
property adjoining the Victor property.6
[At Meyer's Cove] There was some browning of needles, some marginal
loss of color of broad-leafed plants. I remember a persimmon in
part icular, but nothing of any severity.6
[At Sunset Hills] There was, at the foot of Florida Avenue, on
some pines, small ones, a suggestion of tip injury.6
[Near the plant] There was some discoloration of sweet potatoes
growing there and of the weed vermifuge. Just across what is known
as Anclote Road, that little residential property, there was a
gum, I believe it was a gum, that showed some such discoloration
of foliage.6
[Inside the Victor fence] I cannot be certain as to that [discoloration].
I believe there was some as seen by the glasses. They are very
big trees. Some faint signs of some discoloration up there in
the tops. There was no excessive defoliation of the pines.6
Later that same month, Claypool returned to Tarpon Springs. Since
his visit 2 weeks earlier, he noticed that "Appearances had
improved by May 26th. By that time, new growth had become
where it was visible within the area I inspected, especially in
February, and that normal new growth made the reddened condition
of the old needles less conspicuous."6 The witness
indicated that there was no new foliage on oak trees, and no change
in the scrub palmetto, gums, weeds, and other foliage.6
In June 1948, after receiving notice of the lawsuit, Claypool returned
to Tarpon Springs. During this visit, he claimed that,
I found no evidence whatever of any fume or gas damage in the
vicinity of the plant. I found evidence at Tarpon Springs, Victor
and between Tampa and this area of severe drought. It was reported
that in the months of May and June up to that time, rainfall had
been less that one-fourth of normal. Fires had been obviously,
a frequent occurrence throughout that area.6
The questioner asked whether the witness was saying no evidence,
or no new evidence. Claypool replied, "No evidence of any new.
The pine needles that had shown some discoloration back as far as
February were still discolored. They never regained their green."
When Claypool was asked if there was some evidence of perhaps fume
or gas damage or, at least, a damage of some kind, he answered,
"Yes, yes."6
Claypool indicated that there was a problem with his investigation
during the June visit, "Foliage growing on the ground had
been largely destroyed, excepting the scrub palmettos, they
had survived, were still there. But the undergrowth of weeds and
what-not had been destroyed." He indicated that there had been
some fires, but not near the plant.6 Claypool also stated
that despite the dry season leading up to the June inspection, trees
were making a normal recovery, that new growth was continuing and
that new candles or terminal growth were unmarked.6
During a July 1948 visit to Tarpon Springs, Claypool found no evidence
of additional injury to plant life.6 In September 1948, he found
no evidence of additional damage by discoloration.6 In
April 1949, Claypool returned to Tarpon Springs and inspected the
area with Harry Paul and Paul Crider, employees of Victor. His declared
that,
I saw no evidence of injury on the properties of the plaintiffs
themselves in so far as I could see. The Turnpaw property, for
instance, I saw from the vantage point of a residence just west
of his occupied by a Mr. Stansbury, I believe. This was the first
time I had ever been down that close to the property. There were
some pine trees on that property, tall ones, that seen through
glasses showed some red needles, but I had no particular reason
to believe that they were caused by any gas or fume because there
was no definite path of injury leading up to them. For instance,
four big pines on the Stansbury property were unmarked.6
[On the Flanagan property] I saw nothing abnormal in the appearance
of vegetation, as nearly as I could see at all.6
[On the Mickler property] There was no change in the appearance
of the property as it adjoins the Victor plant... [On the 10 to
12 trees mentioned in the May 1948 visit] I found those trees
and they were in a flourishing condition... Well, I mean by flourishing,
that the new growth, the candles, as I believe they call them,
were really exceptionally good in appearance as to size and no
sign of discoloration whatever. New growth had not taken the place
of all of the old growth.6
Claypool may have qualified as an expert if the test were applied
in the court in the late 1940s. However, no such review was conducted
and no grant of expertise status was granted by a court. Furthermore,
the following should be noted:
* Counsel for the plaintiffs did not cross-examine the witness.
* Examinations were conducted from a distance (the closest was 10
yards), without trespass, with field glasses. One plaintiff
owned more than 5,000 acres and leased 600 more, which would be difficult
to view with field glasses.
* The witness was provided as an expert in damages to trees and plants,
yet he was not sure as to what new growth on pine trees (candles)
was named.
Herman Justice, factory accountant, was deposed
on behalf of Victor, and testified that approximately 175 persons
were employed at the plant, with about 140 to 145 working in operations.9
He also indicated that as he passed along he had observed
discoloration of pine needles for about 4 months, and that prior
to the plant starting operations he had not made such observations.9
Victor Chemical's third employee deponent
was E.A. Holtgrewe, who was in charge of operations at the
plant. He stated that his duties were to operate the various processes
at the plant, in the prescribed manner, as handed to him by Crider.
When asked what temperature the rock is subjected to in the kiln,
Holtgrewe answered, "That is a question that is pretty hard
to answer. I don't know as I could give any light on that."
He also did not know if other elements are removed from the rock
during the heating process, besides moisture and phosphorus. He
further did not know what the furnace temperature was or whether
the phosphorus released during the process was a gas and if it was
condensed.9
Holtgrewe was asked if white or gray vapors escaped the plant,
and answered,
Yes sir. There are visible signs of some vapors... I am quite
sure they are not coming from any of the stacks... Well, I have
never seen any vapors come from the stacks... There is some smoke
that raises off the slag as it is tapped from the furnace... It
is the only vapor that is visible from any distance. What you
may have referred to before as vapors coming from the stack
is vapors coming from the scrubbing tower, which is dissipated
within a short distance of the scrubbing tower.9
Holtgrewe also indicated that since about March, he had noticed
pine trees just south of the plant turning brown, but he did not
know if they were dead.9
In late spring and during the summer of 1948,
governmental agencies were receiving and responding to citizens
complaints. On May 17, 1948, Dr. John McDonald, director of the
Florida State Board of Health's Division of Industrial Hygiene wrote
to Dr. Paul Haney, director of the Pinellas County Health Department,
regarding a complaint. McDonald indicated that three trips
had been made on May 13 around the Stevens home and conditions were
the same as the day before.28
McDonald spoke to Crider, who seemed to thinks tree damage was
from tree borers. Crider had asked the plant chemist to take samples
of the discharge, but little progress had been made. Crider was,
"reticent about details of the process involved in the plant,"
and asked McDonald to seek permission from the Chicago office to
visit the plant.28
McDonald stated that he had taken a sample of rain water collected
from a nearby roof for analysis.28
On June 4, 1948, Archie Clement, Tarpon Springs city attorney,
saw J. J. Taylor, state chemist, in Tallahassee regarding samples
that Joe McCreary, Tarpon Springs city manager, had sent to the
chemist. Two jugs of water were also delivered for analysis.29
On June 14, 1948, Taylor sent results of tests on vegetation to
McCreary. Sulfur content of the samples was found to be within
a normal range, but the fluorine content was considered excessive.30
On June 14, 1948, McDonald again wrote to Haney, indicating that
he had completed the analysis of water samples from the first week
of June. The samples showed an increase in sulfate, more chlorides
than expected, and phosphates in excess of 0.1 parts per million.
He also reported that a private lab had discovered high concentrations
of fluorine in pine needles taken near the plant.31
On December 9, 1948, McDonald and his staff discussed the plant's
operations and complaints from the public with executives from Victor.
Literature was presented to Victor showing that conifers are particularly
sensitive to sulfur dioxide (SO2), with injury occurring
from prolonged exposure to levels as low as one part per million.
While other parts of the discharge were discussed, it was decided
that SO2 was the agent of importance. McDonald stated
that, The members of the Division feel that the officials of the
company are willing to undertake the reduction of the discharge
of sulfur dioxide from the scrubber tower.
We also feel that conditions at present have improved from what
they were last May. In the early months of the plantŐs operation,
the escape of gases was not well controlled.32
Little to no information is available regarding air pollution from
the 1950s through mid-1970s. The available data is limited to meteorology,
SO2, particulate, and ozone.33 The general
information available is discussed in Chapter 7. One worker, Harland
Kingsley, said that "You could hardly see for the dust. Your
nose would be full of black dust, your whole face was black."
His co-worker, Vernon Hudson added, "It was hell. The steam
and slag and dust flying all the time. You could hardly breathe."34
In July 1977, an air monitoring station was installed near the
southeast corner of the plant. Air samples for SO2 were
collected by a 24-hour bubbler and 3-hour continuous monitoring.
Sulfur dioxides near the plant exceeded the Florida standard until
1980, when a dramatic decline occurred, coinciding with the time
Stauffer began to shut down the plant.
Table 2 shows the maximum annual SO2 levels from 1977
to 1981. 13
Table 2. Maximum Annual Sulfur Dioxide Levels from
1977 to 1981 24-Hour Bubbler 3-Hour Continuous
| |
Sulfur Dioxide |
| |
24-Hour Bubbler |
3-Hour Continuous |
| Year |
mg/m 3 |
ppm |
mg/m 3 |
ppm |
| 1977 |
175 |
0.28 |
1877 |
0.72 |
| 1978 |
907 |
0.35 |
1550 |
0.60 |
| 1979 |
592 |
0.23 |
2026 |
0.78 |
| 1980 |
204 |
0.08 |
569 |
0.22 |
| 1981 |
149 |
0.06 |
463 |
0.18 |
In December 1979, PED Co Environmental, Inc., a contractor for
EPA Region IV, conducted a field inspection of the facility and
found that many parts of the operation complied with applicable
air standards. However, inspectors found problems with the furnace
and the slag pit areas. Allowable emissions for the furnace were
listed at 30.566 pounds per hour (lb/hr) (tapping) and 30.09 lb/hr
(flushing).35
While the furnace complied with particulate emissions, the hood
did not capture all emissions. The total emissions were estimated
at 83.4 lb./hr, plus the uncontrolled hood loss. The inspectors
commented that,
The major reason for the emission of uncontrolled particulate
emissions from the flushing and tapping operations are the intense
heat of the slags and the quantities produced... It is our opinion
that improvements in hood design can reduce fugitive emissions
within the furnace area, but the emissions from the slag pit and
slag run out of the building cannot be controlled by hooding.
The particulate sources, with the exception of the tapping operation,
appear to be well controlled and operated at near peak performance.
The emissions from the slag tapping operations, however, appear
to have impacted on local total suspended particulate levels.
The submicron nature of the plume and its low level of release
do not allow adequate dispersion of the emissions.35
Ronald Roberson, industrial hygienist for the Tarpon Springs plant,
said in a deposition that, "When I started in '72 there were
approximately, I would say a dozen pieces of pollution equipment
in the plant, largely types of bag house dust collectors, scrubbers,
that type of thing."36
He stated that the dust collection equipment was added to the kiln
in 1975 or 1976. 36 Roberson also indicated that the plant was having
problems with fugitive phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5), and that, "There
was quite a bit of fugitive P2O5 emissions in the area. P2O5i is
very visible, its very easy to detect by sight. ItŐs white in color
and very dense."36
Jerry Harris, the plant manager at the time the plant closed, stated
in a sworn deposition that the plant at Tarpon Springs was similar
to the plant in Silver Bow, Montana.37 In 1979, the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) did a health
hazard evaluation determination (Report No. 79-8-584) regarding
the operation of the Silver Bow plant. According to the report,
"A potential health hazard did exist at the time of the survey
due to excessive airborne concentrations of P2O5
and respirable crystalline silica."38 Employees
were overexposed to both contaminants. In his testimony, Harris
admitted that the Tarpon Springs plant had been cited in 1979 by
the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) for dust
violations.37
In his 1985 deposition, Eugene Anderson, a Stauffer employee for
33 years (working his way into management) made the following remark
that confirmed what many had thought was the truth, that for
many years, little to no pollution control equipment was used at
the plant:
Q: Of your own personal knowledge, do you know whether Stauffer
Chemical Company had environmental control devices to either catch
or warn of the existence of certain things in the atmosphere or
the working environment of the employees out there?
A: At what stage of the game are you talking about?
Q: Well, let's take it from either last first or when you first
started.
A: When I first started there was no controls whatsoever.
Q: What happened over time?
A: Over the period of thirty-three years they put in different
collection equipment.
Q: Scrubbers?
A: Scrubbers.39
Complaints about air pollution were documented until shortly before
the plant closed. On March 4, 1980, Joyce Gibbs, chief of the Pinellas
County Air and Water Quality Division, transmitted a memorandum
entitled "Summary of Stauffer Chemical Company Complaints,"
to Jacob Stowers, director of the Department of Environmental Management,
outlining 30 complaints from May 19, 1975, to December 9, 1979.
One complaint was accompanied by a petition signed by 24 persons
and nine letters asking the state to deny Stauffer's proposed permit.
Another complaint was a log of fugitive articulate emissions with
photos.40
From May to July 1979, the owners of Flaherty Marina, adjacent
to the plant, kept a log of emissions problems.41 Personnel
at the marina complained of burning eyes and throat, headache,
nausea, tightness of the chest, and difficulty breathing until the
fog passed. Dan Flaherty, owner of the marina, told the ombudsman
that emissions from the plant damaged the high-gloss paint on
a boat in the marina and that he had to completely repaint the boat.
He further alleged that with all his complaints, nothing was
done until he called the attorney general.42
On April 12, 1997, Flaherty told the St. Petersburg Times,
"That stuff was toxic enough that when they had one
flash in the furnace building, several hundred pigeons were killed.
They were flopping in the air."43 Table 3 is
a record of the log entries.
| Date |
Time |
Conditions |
| May 31 |
07:50 p.m. |
Couldn't see, even with headlights (seven witnesses) |
| June 11 |
06:10 p.m. |
Complete blackout, seemed to come from about base
of new stack |
| June 15 |
2:11 p.m. |
Complete visibility loss |
| June 16 |
08:30 a.m. |
Complete visual obscurity |
| June 18 |
03:12 p.m. |
70% visibility loss |
| June 20 |
04:00 p.m. |
90% visibility loss |
| June 23 |
01:10 p.m. |
100% visibility loss |
| July 04 |
08:10 a.m. |
100% visibility loss |
| July 04 |
09:10 a.m. |
90% visibility loss |
| July 04 |
10:10 a.m. |
70% visibility loss |
| July 04 |
10:40 a.m. |
75% visibility loss |
| July 15 |
11:45 a.m. |
90% visibility loss (See exhibits 7 and 8) |
On October 11, 1979, a warning letter (No. 52-79-10-168) was sent
to Stauffer, resulting from complaints of excessive smoke, fumes,
odor, and particulate emissions. The letter, prompted by citizen
complaints and subsequent inspections/surveillance, listed seven
identified violations.44 Stauffer responded to the letter
and specifically outlined revised efforts to control P2O5
and particulate emissions.45
In March 1980, a petition with 149 signatures was sent to Gibbs,
expressing concern regarding air emissions and the health of children
and wildlife.46
On April 17, 1980, an air pollution episode occurred at Stauffer
when the electric arc furnace malfunctioned and was shutdown. Visual
emissions tests yielded average emissions of 69.5% and 93.75% in
a 6-minute period. During a 1 1/2 -hour period, a suspected P2O5
cloud was observed and did not abate, engulfing the building and
extending for 1/2 mile or more downwind. The prevailing winds carried
the plume east-southeast over populated areas.47 The episode occurred
at 9:15 a.m. and emissions were visible until 6:15 p.m.48
On February 6, 1980, Jean Graf, a research scientist for IIT Research
Institute, sent a letter to Wayne Martin, of the Pinellas County
Air and Water Quality Division, discussing results of air samples
from the plant. She concluded that fugitive emissions relating to
materials handling are the main cause of total suspended particulate
(TSP) levels near the plant.49 In letters to Martin on October 12,
50 and November 2, 1979, 51 Graf detailed the findings of the microscopic
analysis of air emission samples. She reported indications of "a
strong impact from calcium phosphate source which, I presume was
a processing plant producing phosphates for fertilizers."41
The TSP standard of 60 :g/m 3 was violated in Pinellas County from
May 1, 1977, through the second week of August 1981.52 TSP
and SO2 violations were recorded from 1977 to 1980 in Tarpon Springs,
with the 24-hour TSP standard being violated 4 times, the 24-hour
bubbler SO2 standard being violated 5 times, the 3-hour continuous
SO2 standard being violated 10 times, and the 24-hour continuous
SO2 standard being violated 17 times. The TSP standard was met or
exceeded six times in 1978 and 1979, and nearly reached another
nine times.
On February 25, 1980, Gibbs sent a memorandum to the director of
the Florida Department of Environmental Management, summarizing
the micro file on Tarpon Springs.53
On October 23, 1978, Larry George, of the Florida Department of
Environmental Regulation (FDER), now the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), wrote a memorandum to Dave Puchaty, of FDEP,
regarding an August 15,1978 report by Dames and Moore for Stauffer.
George wrote the following:
This report substantiates the Department's position that the
SO2 ambient violations near Tarpon Springs are due
almost entirely to emissions from the Stauffer Chemical Company
phosphate kiln stack. Included in the report are ambient data
collected by the company at a site 0.31 km north of the plant
which indicate 10 exceedances of the 24-hours standard and 8 exceedances
of the 3-hours standard during 1977. 54
In 1979, the highest pollutant standard index (PSI) value recorded
in Tarpon Springs was 400, with SO2 listed as the responsible
pollutant. This value was the highest in Florida, by nearly three
times. The average PSI value for Tarpon Springs was 25, which was
near the bottom for averages.55
In January 1979, FDEP issued an air emissions delayed compliance
order to Stauffer.56 Compliance measurement of the Stauffer
plant was a problem. Peter Hessling, of the Pinellas County Air
and Water Quality Division, told the ombudsman that,
To the best of my knowledge, they never actually completed a
stack test while I was inspecting, from 1980 forward. Something
always went wrong, something was missing or didn't work. The main
problem was when they tapped the furnace. It looked like the gates
of hell glowing in the dark, it gave off steam and lots of emissions-phosphorus
pentoxide.57
In 1981, after Stauffer ceased operations, the air quality in Pinellas
County improved markedly. The 1983 air quality report cited a 28%
reduction from 1980.58
Table 5 details emissions from 1978 to 1983. Table 5 details emissions
from 1978 to 1983.
| |
Year |
| Emissions Type |
1978 |
1979 |
1980 |
1981 |
1982 |
1983 |
| Particulate Matter |
1,155.19 |
1,308.64 |
1,956.50 |
1,139.82 |
868.59 |
549.08 |
| Sulfur Dioxide |
27,813.39 |
31,859.57 |
33,652.55 |
30,241.61 |
27,312.68 |
17,838.80 |
In response to the worker safety announcement sent to former
Stauffer employees, one former employee wrote that:
Even in the early days of plant operation our local manager
had controversies with Tarpon Springs government officials. The
city complained many times about the fumes, smoke, and dust, which
the wind carried across the river and over the city.
The slag at the furnace had to be cooled by spraying with water.
This generated huge clouds of steam into the air above us, and
over the city.
Our manager finally ordered [name-withheld] to install a wind direction-and-speed
monitoring device on top of the water tower. We ran a cable from
the furnace building to the wind machine, and in the furnace building
installed a strip-chart recording instrument.This continuously recorded
the changes in the wind. The chart was replaced and studied daily.
Whenever city officials complained about pollution from the plant,
our manager would descend on city hall armed with data and able
to exploit any slight discrepancies in the verbal testimonies being
given by the citizens. We had them at wits end by showing their
figures in error - their wind drift and speed out of order - so
more confusion and bad feelings.59
Other factors contributing to questions in the minds of the public
are spills and uncontrolled fires which occurred at the plant. Little
information was made available to the public to reduce fears when
incidents occurred. George McCall, of the Pinellas County Health
Department, frequently spoke with plant management. He told the
ombudsman that, "There were noticeable emissions when the slag
was pulled out, but they tried to improve and reduce emissions in
about 1961, or 1962 with collection systems. They looked good to
me. They had phosphorus pentoxide, total phosphate and fluorides."
McCall also indicated that a ring of 10 sampling stations were installed
near the plant.60 None of the air emissions data has been discovered.60
While little data exists to determine air emissions during the
plant's operation, we know that complaints were registered throughout
its years of operation. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude
that the plant had problems with air pollution during the entire
period of the operation.
To learn more about pollution from the phosphate fertilizer
industry, see www.fluoridealert.org/phosphate/overview.htm
|