Fluridone - CAS No. 59756-60-4. Local Battles.
Summer 2001. The Pesticide Sonar: Lake George Pesticide Plan on Hold.
The Adirondack Council of New York
 
 
Return to Index for
Local Battles
Fluridone

 

The Adirondack Council of New York

Summer 2001 Newsletter

The Pesticide Sonar: Lake George Pesticide Plan on Hold

"If it's a choice between killing milfoil and saving native species, we'll choose killing milfoil." Pesticide consultant to Lake George Park Commission, April 2001

The Adirondack Park Agency in July voted to hold a formal public hearing this summer on an "experiment" to use chemical pesticides to kill Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake George. This chemical pesticide has never been allowed in the Adirondack Park.

The Adirondack Council had urged the APA to hold a formal hearing after the applicant admitted that the pesticide it plans to use will also kill rare and threatened native plants along with the milfoil. Even harming protected plants carries a $25 fine per plant.

The Council wanted the APA to hold a public hearing to resolve this issue, and others, before the APA rules on the application. The adjudicatory hearing ordered in mid-July by the APA Board of Commissioners will allow the APA to gather sworn testimony, while allowing the Adirondack Council and other parties to cross examine consultants and expert witnesses.

The Council also cautioned the applicant that the Council would fight any attempt to loosen state health regulations that currently prevent the application of the pesticide near drinking water intakes. The applicant's draft environmental impact statement makes it clear that talks were already underway to petition the NYS Health Department for permission to apply the pesticide Sonar in the southern basin of the lake. That's where most of the milfoil is growing adjacent to a home or business, many of which draw water from the lake.

Unlike exotic invasive plants such as milfoil, native plants play an integral role in the lake's ecosystem. Native plants provide food and shelter to fish and other aquatic animals and are compatible with other native plants. They remove nutrients and other particles that can make the water cloudy.

Invasive exotics are non-native species accidentally transported to a new location. Eurasian watermilfoil was brought to Lake George in boats and trailers. Exotics sometimes out-compete native plants and overtake their habitats. It is sometimes necessary for people to intervene to protect native plants. But the method chosen makes a world of difference.

The applicant for the APA pesticide permit is the Lake George Park Commission (LGPC). So far, the commission has employed only non-toxic methods -- hand harvesting, plastic mats, suction hoses and the like -- to control Eurasian watermilfoil. The LGPC has employed those methods very successfully for many years.

Eurasian milfoil has been present in Lake George since 1985. Thanks to the LGPC's non-toxic methods, it covers less than 2 percent of the lake bottom.

The Adirondack Council has offered to work with the LGPC to find more money to continue the non-toxic harvesting and control methods. (The Council believes that chemical pesticides are a last resort, to be used only when non-toxic alternatives have failed.) Instead, LGPC has continued to press for a permit to use pesticides.

The LGPC has argued that chemical pesticides (in this case, a fluridone-based product called Sonar) are less expensive than non-toxic controls. They require less labor and less planning.

On the other hand, they can kill much more than exotic milfoil.

There are 48 plants native to Lake George. Despite claims from the consultant that Sonar is safe, the applicant's environmental impact statement admits that they have no data on what will happen to 32 of those 48 species when Sonar is applied.

There are at least six plants native to Lake George that are scarce enough to be protected under the state's "rare, threatened and endangered" plants law. The applicant's environmental impact statement provided no data on what the pesticide will do to at least five of them. Three of those five species are present in one or all of the proposed application areas in the lake. The applicant wants the APAÕs permission to kill them all.

At an April meeting, the applicant's consultant declared: "If it's a choice between killing milfoil and saving native species, we'll choose killing milfoil." The consultant recommended using more than 2,000 pounds of the chemical at four sites in Lake George.

Taking a broader view, the Council is concerned about the precedent of allowing chemical herbicides in any of the Parks' 2,800 lakes and ponds.

Caption under photo: Lake George's south basin in July. The APA wants more information before making a decision on using pesticides to control Eurasian milfoil. Photo by John F. Sheehan.

 

 
Fluoride Action Network | Pesticide Project | 315-379-9200 | pesticides@fluoridealert.org