Fluoride: Journal of the International Society for Fluoride Research
October 1969, Volume 2, Pages 206-213 "NEIGHBORHOOD"
FLUOROSIS
by G. L. Waldbott and V. A. Cecilioni
Detroit Michigan and Hamilton, Ontario
Fluoride fumes, mainly HF and SiF4, and particulate fluoride compounds,
especially NaF, escape from chimneys, storage bins and effluent
ponds of factories which employ fluoride compounds as a flux or
where fluoride constitutes a by-product of refining and smelting
processes. The principal industries involved are those concerned
with the production of aluminum, steel, enamel, zirconium, uranium,
magnesium, triple phosphate fertilizer, glass, tile and bricks.
Fluoride is also liberated into the air wherever wood and coal are
burned. Gaseous HF and SiF4 hydrolyze with the moisture of the air
and settle on the ground, on plants, fruit, vegetables and on forage
for cattle.
In humans, fluoride-contaminated food and water constitute the bulk
of fluoride intake in polluted areas. In the vicinity of an Ontario fertilizer plant,
dust contained between 9, 000 and 11, 000 ppm of fluoride, near
a Michigan iron foundry up to 2, 000 PPM The dust from the fertilizer
plant covered practically everything in the area and settled on
topsoil. Fluoride fumes etched windows and damaged the finish of
automobiles.
The data presented here concern 32 patients. Twenty-eight of them
resided near the above-mentioned fertilizer factory, 3 near Iowa
fertilizer factories, 1 near a Michigan iron foundry. Four of the
32 were hospitalized for diagnostic studies. Fifteen were examined.
In the remaining 13, data were obtained from the medical history
given to us by the patients. In all cases, characteristic fluoride
damage in plants, livestock and materials was established.
The two conspicuous and readily recognizable manifestations of chronic
fluoride poisoning, dental and skeletal fluorosis, are not obligatory
features of the disease. Dental fluorosis (or mottling of teeth)
occurs only in individuals who have consumed, or have been exposed
to, fluoride during childhood. The skeletal changes of the disease
develop only after many years of persistent fluoride intake. The
latter condition need not be considered here, since the air polluting
factories have been in operation less than seven years.
History
Table 1 presents the ages and sexes
of the 32 cases, the distance of their residence from the factory,
and the symptoms which they presented. Ten of the 32 patients manifested
the skin lesions described by Steinegger
(2) and by Colombini et al. (3) among residents near fluoride-emitting
aluminum plants in the vicinity of Chizzola and of Bolzano, Italy.
They are bluish-brown, macular areas, round or oval in shape, about
the size of a dime (Fig. 1, 2). They are painless, fleeting in character
with a duration of 5 to 10 days. They simulate purpuric lesions
or traumatic suffusions but do not exhibit histological evidence
of capillary permeability. Microscopically, they show lymphocytic
perivascular infiltration and edema in the corium with occasional
melanin deposits in the epidermis.
Gradually increasing general malaise and exhaustion leading to complete
disability characterizes the disease. All individuals except two
boys (sic), ages 12 and 13, reported pain and stiffness in the lumbar
and cervical spine with restriction of spinal movements and arthritis
in other joints as well. They complained of myalgia and paresthesias
in arms, legs and shoulders with impaired muscular power of hands
and legs. Consequently, they were no longer able to grip objects
securely and their legs tended to collapse when walking. Eight patients
had muscular fibrillation, 3 intermittent muscle spasms especially
in the big toes suggestive of hypocalcemic episodes, a common feature
in acute fluoride intoxication (Table 2).
| TABLE 2 |
| Symptomatology in 32
Cases of "Neighborhood" Fluorosis |
| |
No. of Cases |
| 1. Neuromuscular-Skeletal |
|
Arthritis, especially in cervical and lumbar
spine |
30 |
Myalgia; myasthenia; paresthesias |
30 |
Spasticity in extremities |
3 |
Muscular fibrillation |
8 |
Migraine-like headaches |
20 |
Visual disturbances (scotomata, blurred vision) |
8 |
| |
|
| 2. Gastro-Intestinal |
|
Gastric (nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain) |
18 |
Intestinal (distention; spastic constipation,
diarrhea) |
16 |
Acute abdominal episodes |
9 |
| |
|
| 3. Respiratory |
|
Nasal and conjunctival |
28 |
Emphysema; asthma |
4 |
Epistaxis |
7 |
| |
|
| 4. Chizzola Maculae |
10 |
Bilateral migraine-like headaches
were encountered in 20 of the 32 cases. Ten patients complained
of visual disturbances (scotomata, blurred vision) which were not
corrected by glasses. Two had evidence of incipient retinitis, a
condition encountered also in hydrofluorosis (1).
Eighteen of the 32 individuals had gastrointestinal disturbances,
the second group of symptoms described in fluorosis. They had frequent
nausea, occasional vomiting, pains in the epigastrium and in the
intestinal tract, bloating and distention of the abdomen. Sixteen
of the 32 had spastic constipation, alternating with diarrhea. Nine
had repeated acute abdominal episodes simulating, and diagnosed
by their physicians as, volvulus, acute gallbladder disease, "intestinal
flu" and the like. Several patients identified these episodes
with temporary intake of excessive amounts of fluoride-contaminated
food grown near the factory (cabbage, lettuce, beans) (Table 3).
| TABLE 3 |
| Fluoride Assays of Food
Consumed by Cases #22 and #25 |
| |
PPM |
"Normal" Values |
| *Wheat (grain) |
2.6 |
0.7 to 2.0* |
| * Apples |
6.6 |
0.8 |
| * Carrots |
7.0 |
2.0 |
| * Beets |
7.0 |
0.7 to 2.8 |
| * Squash |
10.4 |
|
| * Corn |
1.3 |
0.7 |
| * Sauerkraut |
10.7 |
|
| * Currants |
8.0 |
0.7 |
| * Cabbage Leaves |
9.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| ** "Chicken vegetable soup" |
4.6 |
|
| ** "Hamburger with onions" |
2.4 |
|
| ** Potatoes (boiled) |
7.7 |
0.4 |
| ** Beans (cooked) |
17.3 |
1.7 |
| ** Strawberries (frozen) |
4.6 |
|
| ** Oatmeal (cooked) |
5.1 |
0.2 |
| |
|
|
| *** Lettuce |
44.0 |
0.1 to 0.3 |
Analysis by
* Dr. K. Garber, State's Institute of Botany, Hamburg, Germany
** Dr. W. Oelschlager, Agricultural University, Hohenheim, Germany
*** Ontario Water Resources Commission |
In the third group of symptoms concerning
the respiratory tract, nasal and conjunctival irritation was common,
especially on windy days; but chronic bronchitis and emphysema was
noted in only 4 of the 32 individuals.
More significant, however, is the history of frequent epistaxis
in six patients which they related to sudden excessive exposure
to dust.
Examination Findings
Examination and laboratory data were unremarkable as is usually
the case in the early stage of chronic fluorosis (4). Two patients
manifested exaggerated tendon reflexes, especially in the lower
extremities. In others, pain was elicited on palpation of the abdomen.
Abdominal distention, joint swelling and restriction of joint movements,
especially in the lower spine, were noted. In the hospitalized cases,
the spinal X-rays showed changes indicative of osteoarthritis. Hypercalcemia,
hyperuricemia, slight impairment of liver function were noted but
were not sufficiently consistent to be attributed to chronic fluoride
intoxication.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis of chronic fluoride intoxication was based on the
following criteria:
1. Excessive exposure to fluoride in food, air and water was established
by visible damage to crops, livestock and materials. The vegetation
showed the typical fluoride damage of margins and tips of leaves
and high fluoride levels. The cattle exhibited the characteristic
features of fluorosis i.e. exostoses, joint swellings. Fluoride
assays of food consumed by cases 20 to 22 and by case 25 yielded
values up to 20 times those grown in non-polluted areas (Table 3)
2. The clinical picture is identical in the 32 individuals, and
agrees with the non-skeletal phase of fluorosis in industry (5),
of hydrofluorosis (6), of "neighborhood" fluorosis described
by Murray
and Wilson (7) and by Capps and Hunter (8) and with the recently
described symptomatology of chronic poisoning due to fluoride intake
for therapeutic purposes (9). Fig. 3 presents the incidence of the
symptomatology encountered near the Ontario factory
compared with that in 28 consecutive cases seen in an allergy practice
(G. L.W.) and 28 in general practice (V.A. C.). The difference in
the incidence of arthritis
in the 3 groups of cases is particularly noteworthy.

3. In four cases, 24 hour urinary fluoride values were obtained;
in three cases, biopsy tissue. Table 4 shows a high fluoride content
of bone and soft tissue and an unusually high urinary fluoride excretion,
namely 7.04 to 12.63 mg. Since in most instances only a fraction
of ingested fluoride is excreted in the urine, the daily fluoride
intake must have been considerable.
| TABLE 4 |
| Fluoride Assays |
| |
PPM |
"Normal" Values
PPM |
| Water * |
< 1: in 3 persons |
|
| |
1 to 9.9: in 15 persons |
|
| |
10 to 14.9: in 8 persons |
|
| |
15: in 4 persons |
|
| |
37.8: in 1 person |
|
| Soil * |
85 to 520 |
51 to 361 (G) |
| Dust * |
8,850 to 11,450 |
|
| Hay * |
3 to 191 |
1 to 6 (G) |
| Egg Plant (Leaves)* |
52.0 |
|
| Wheat (Heads)* |
9.1 |
2.3 to 6.4 (G) |
| Human Tissue: |
|
|
Bone (case 25) |
641.3 and 864.1 (O) |
<300 (Roholm 5) |
Muscle (case 5) |
116.4 (O) |
<1 PPM (JAMA 204:970, 1968) |
Prostrate (case 5) |
92.2 (O) |
|
Blood ** (case 5,6) |
0.2 to 0.4 |
0.0123 (Nature 211:192, 1966) |
| 24-hour Urine |
7.04 mg to 12.63 mg |
|
* The Ontario Dept. of Agriculture and Food
** the Ontario Dept. of Health
(G) Dr. K. Garber, State's Institute of Botany, Hamburg, Germany
(O) Dr. W. Oelschlager, Agricultural University, Hohenheim,
Germany |
4. In 10 individuals, the recently described "Chizzola Maculae"
were recorded, a condition which we have also encountered near a fluoride
emitting aluminum factory and in fluorosis from drinking water.
The above data clearly point to the fact that fluoride emission from
the four factories was the source of the illness. Studies in support
of our observations are in progress. Summary
In 32 individuals residing near fluoride-emitting fertilizer factories
and an iron foundry where fluoride damage to vegetation, livestock
and to materials was established, evidence of the non-skeletal phase
of fluorosis is presented.
The symptomatology of the disease is identical with that of the non-skeletal
phase of fluorosis recorded by others in industrial fluorosis, in
"neighborhood" fluorosis, in hydrofluorosis and in fluoride
intoxication from long-term administration of fluoride tablets. Principally
involved are musculoskeletal, gastro-intestinal and respiratory systems.
Fluoride assays of hay, flydust, food, human tissue and urine are
presented. Ten individuals exhibited the skin lesions designated as
"Chizzola Maculae" which have been described recently in
populations exposed to fluoride emanations near aluminum factories
in Italy. Bibliography
1. Waldbott, G. L.: Incipient Chronic Fluoride Intoxication from
Drinking Water 1. Report on 52 cases. Acta Medica Scand. 156:157-168,
1956. Read before the Fourth International Congress of Internal
Medicine in Madrid, Spain, Sept. 24, 1956.
2. Steinegger, S.: Endemic Skin Lesions Near an Aluminum Factory,
Fluoride, 2:37, January 1969.
3. Colombini, M., Mauri, C., Olivo, R. and Vivoli, G.: Observations
on Fluorine Pollution due to Emissions from an Aluminum Plant in
Trentino. Fluoride, 2:40, January 1969. http://www.fluoridealert.org/trentino.htm
4. Waldbott, G. L.: Fluoride in Clinical Medicine.. Suppl. 1 ad
Vol. 20, Internat. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol., 1962.
5. Roholm, Kaj: Fluorine Intoxication: A Clinical Hygienic Study,
Arnold Busck, Copenhagen, 1937.
6. Frada, G. , Mentesana, G. and Nalbone, G.: Richerche Sull 'ldrofluorosi,
Minerva Medica 54:45-59, 1963.
7. Murray, M. M. and Wilson, D. C.: Fluorine Hazards with Special
Reference to Some Social Consequences of Industry Processes. The
Lancet 2:821-4, 1946. Paper available online at http://www.fluoridealert.org/Lancet-1946.htm
8. Reynolds Metals Co. vs the Paul Martin family, Transcript of
Record Nos. 14990-14991-14992 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Ninth District.
9. Rich, C.: J.A.M.A. 196:149, June 27, 1966.
To learn more about fluoride pollution, see
www.fluoridealert.org/f-pollution.htm
|