In sum, the new survey data released today by CDC confirms
that total fluoride exposure among U.S. children A) remains
too high, B) may be increasing, and C) needs to be lowered.
______________________________________________________________
UPDATE (March 2007): CDC Releases New Fluorosis Data
In March of 2007, the CDC provided updated information on the rate of dental fluorosis among US schoolchildren. According to this latest information, 41% of children aged 12-15 now have some form of fluorosis, whereas 36% of children 16-19 have fluorosis. The CDC provided this information at a conference of the International Association of Dental Research (IADR). A summary of CDC's presentation can be found online at: http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2007orleans/techprogram/abstract_92598.htm
The following is an excerpt:
Prevalence of Enamel Fluorosis Among 12-19 Year-Olds, U.S., 1999-2004
E. BELTRAN, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA, and L. BARKER, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
Objective: To describe the prevalence of enamel fluorosis among adolescents aged 12 to 15 and 16 to 19 years using data from the three most recent cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) in the U.S: 1999-2000, 2001-2002, and 2003-2004. Methods: NHANES is an ongoing survey of representative samples of the civilian non institutionalized U.S. population. Intraoral examinations were conducted by seven trained dentists using standardized criteria, with no examiner serving in all three cycles. Enamel fluorosis was assessed in all permanent teeth using Dean's Fluorosis Index (DFI). Data were analyzed in SAS and SUDAAN to account for the complex sample design. Results: Table below presents percentages (standard errors) and prevalence of fluorosis, including very mild or higher severity. Conclusions: Between 1999 and 2004, approximately 41% of adolescents aged 12 to 15 and 36% aged 16 to 19 years had enamel fluorosis. Moderate and severe fluorosis was observed in less than 4% in both age groups. Considering the little historical change in fluoride sources and practices at the age these adolescents were at risk for fluorosis, differences among data cycles suggest inter-examiner variability.